Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ethnic Studies Report"

From WikiCU
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
*why is this nominated for deletion? [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 01:51, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
*why is this nominated for deletion? [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 01:51, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:*Hmm, I guess it doesn't really need to be deleted. It does seem like it was just copied and pasted from somewhere though. A link to the original document might be more appropriate. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:47, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:*Hmm, I guess it doesn't really need to be deleted. It does seem like it was just copied and pasted from somewhere though. A link to the original document might be more appropriate. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:47, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:*Yes, it was originally posted on another wiki. but the info here is definitely about columbia and it should have a place to live here. [[User:Bmercer|Bmercer]]
+
::*Yes, it was originally posted on another wiki. but the info here is definitely about columbia and it should have a place to live here. [[User:Bmercer|Bmercer]]
 +
:::*Wouldn't it be sufficient to have a short introduction, then a link to the actual report if people want to read it? [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 12:31, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:31, 23 April 2007

  • why is this nominated for deletion? wang 01:51, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Hmm, I guess it doesn't really need to be deleted. It does seem like it was just copied and pasted from somewhere though. A link to the original document might be more appropriate. Reaganaut 03:47, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Yes, it was originally posted on another wiki. but the info here is definitely about columbia and it should have a place to live here. Bmercer
  • Wouldn't it be sufficient to have a short introduction, then a link to the actual report if people want to read it? Reaganaut 12:31, 23 April 2007 (EDT)