Difference between revisions of "WikiCU talk:Deletion policy"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) (→Voting procedure) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Voting procedure == | == Voting procedure == | ||
* '''75%''' of reputable users (admins and users who have made at least a few contributions) must vote to delete, otherwise we keep the article. Why? Because I think that at this stage, I'd prefer to see growth than perfection. The 75% figure is inspired by the EU's [[w:QMV|qualified majority voting]], but I'd also be open to 66% in line with the US Constitution. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | * '''75%''' of reputable users (admins and users who have made at least a few contributions) must vote to delete, otherwise we keep the article. Why? Because I think that at this stage, I'd prefer to see growth than perfection. The 75% figure is inspired by the EU's [[w:QMV|qualified majority voting]], but I'd also be open to 66% in line with the US Constitution. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :* '''Agree''' [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
* After 7 days, any admin (except the one, if any, who proposed the deletion) can use the above criteria and decide whether to keep article or delete it. | * After 7 days, any admin (except the one, if any, who proposed the deletion) can use the above criteria and decide whether to keep article or delete it. | ||
| + | ::* '''Agree''' [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:* If keep, that means remove the deletion tag, rename the deletion discussion saying it is "archived", and noting the result of the deletion discussion. | :* If keep, that means remove the deletion tag, rename the deletion discussion saying it is "archived", and noting the result of the deletion discussion. | ||
| + | ::* '''Agree''' [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:* If delete, well, that's obvious. | :* If delete, well, that's obvious. | ||
:{{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | :{{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::* So delete the article and the talk page? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Appeals == | == Appeals == | ||
* We can write an appeals policy as soon as there's a need. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | * We can write an appeals policy as soon as there's a need. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:16, 2 May 2007
Can we come up with a rule on when it's okay to take action on an article that's been nominated for deletion/move? I propose action can be taken 7 days after the nomination if a majority of the voters on the talk page agree. Nonsensical 18:36, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- Good idea. Here are the things we need to resolve... − Reaganaut 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Time limit
- 7 days As per Nonsensical's proposal. − Reaganaut 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Voting procedure
- 75% of reputable users (admins and users who have made at least a few contributions) must vote to delete, otherwise we keep the article. Why? Because I think that at this stage, I'd prefer to see growth than perfection. The 75% figure is inspired by the EU's qualified majority voting, but I'd also be open to 66% in line with the US Constitution. − Reaganaut 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- Agree Nonsensical 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- After 7 days, any admin (except the one, if any, who proposed the deletion) can use the above criteria and decide whether to keep article or delete it.
- Agree Nonsensical 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- If keep, that means remove the deletion tag, rename the deletion discussion saying it is "archived", and noting the result of the deletion discussion.
- Agree Nonsensical 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- If delete, well, that's obvious.
- − Reaganaut 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
- So delete the article and the talk page? Nonsensical 19:16, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Appeals
- We can write an appeals policy as soon as there's a need. − Reaganaut 19:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
