Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Courses"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I agree with [[User:Pacman|Pacman]]. I prefer "Course Title (Bulletin Code)" as the main article title and then if it has alternate titles, we can redirect to the main article. We can also make redirect pages for "ECON W1105" to go directly to "Principles of Economics (ECON W1105)". Also, stellar work on getting in all these course outlines, [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]]. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 15:01, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ::I agree with [[User:Pacman|Pacman]]. I prefer "Course Title (Bulletin Code)" as the main article title and then if it has alternate titles, we can redirect to the main article. We can also make redirect pages for "ECON W1105" to go directly to "Principles of Economics (ECON W1105)". Also, stellar work on getting in all these course outlines, [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]]. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 15:01, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
::There's only occasionally a problem with conflicting names, though, whereas most of these course codes are completely obscure and unknown to the general student body. I agree with [[Nonsensical]]'s proposal. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 15:08, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ::There's only occasionally a problem with conflicting names, though, whereas most of these course codes are completely obscure and unknown to the general student body. I agree with [[Nonsensical]]'s proposal. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 15:08, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks Nonsensical! I just hope this repository of syllabi gathers some momentum. As for article names, I still strongly believe it makes sense to have the main articles under the course numbers. Some reasons: | ||
| + | * Some courses have multiple names. For example: "Masterpieces of Western Art", "Art Humanities", "Art Hum". | ||
| + | * Some course have one name but people would still type different things to get to the course page. Example: "History of the City of New York", "History of New York City" "History of NYC", "NYC History". | ||
| + | * If you want to quickly go to a course page, you're probably on the bulletin, the directory, or Courseworks, so you have the code at hand. | ||
| + | * Some courses have horrible names. It's much more of a pain to type "Theoretical Foundations of Political Economy" than "ECON X3041". You think that's not too long a title? What about "Topics in the Black Experience: Black Civil Society, International Affairs and United States Foreign Policy" or "Comparative Study of Constitutional Challenges Affecting African, Latino and Asian American Communities"? Even worse, some courses have punctuation which could necessitate a dozen redirecting articles (& , ; : . ?). | ||
| + | * Articles named according to their code will be alphabetized in the courses category. | ||
| + | {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 15:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:22, 4 May 2007
I think a lot of these courses are far better known by their long names, like Frontiers of Science or Principles of Econ. The current list is a meaningless pile of numbers to me. Only math & science courses seem to use the course number shorthand, and I think WikiCU should reflect campus practice as far as this goes. Pacman 14:45, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- Hmmm. Courses are known by many names, so it can get confusing. I think we should use the course numbers, and have redirects for the names... Principles of Economics. − Reaganaut 14:47, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- I agree with Pacman. I prefer "Course Title (Bulletin Code)" as the main article title and then if it has alternate titles, we can redirect to the main article. We can also make redirect pages for "ECON W1105" to go directly to "Principles of Economics (ECON W1105)". Also, stellar work on getting in all these course outlines, Reaganaut. Nonsensical 15:01, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- There's only occasionally a problem with conflicting names, though, whereas most of these course codes are completely obscure and unknown to the general student body. I agree with Nonsensical's proposal. Pacman 15:08, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
Thanks Nonsensical! I just hope this repository of syllabi gathers some momentum. As for article names, I still strongly believe it makes sense to have the main articles under the course numbers. Some reasons:
- Some courses have multiple names. For example: "Masterpieces of Western Art", "Art Humanities", "Art Hum".
- Some course have one name but people would still type different things to get to the course page. Example: "History of the City of New York", "History of New York City" "History of NYC", "NYC History".
- If you want to quickly go to a course page, you're probably on the bulletin, the directory, or Courseworks, so you have the code at hand.
- Some courses have horrible names. It's much more of a pain to type "Theoretical Foundations of Political Economy" than "ECON X3041". You think that's not too long a title? What about "Topics in the Black Experience: Black Civil Society, International Affairs and United States Foreign Policy" or "Comparative Study of Constitutional Challenges Affecting African, Latino and Asian American Communities"? Even worse, some courses have punctuation which could necessitate a dozen redirecting articles (& , ; : . ?).
- Articles named according to their code will be alphabetized in the courses category.
− Reaganaut 15:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
