Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gabriel Morris"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | *'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
*'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | *'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | *'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable? | + | *'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?[[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 00:31, 9 May 2007
Nomination for Deletion
- Delete --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. Umlund 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- Delete - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. − Reaganaut 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine Nonsensical 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- Delete - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?WhatYouKnowAboutThat 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
