Difference between revisions of "Talk:Christopher Mark Morris-Lent"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | == Nomination for deletion == | + | == Nomination for deletion (archived on 5/12/07) == |
− | This page is clearly plagiarized from http://www.xmission.com/~emailbox/chap1.htm. I propose immediate deletion. | + | ===Decision: Keep=== |
− | Love, | + | |
− | CML | + | * '''On the fence.''' It is a vanity page, but so are plenty of others. Not every staff writer for every publication really deserves a page of his/her own, but nor does every member of the Varsity Show. As there are no guidelines beyond our likes/dislikes as to who can and can't have a page, I can't come up with a reason for deleting it that wouldn't include deleting several other pages like it, and this is one of the less offensive ones. I lean towards '''delete''' but don't want to start a purge of similar pages without good reason. [[User:TenPoints|TenPoints]] 00:42, 10 May 2007 (EDT) |
− | * Page improved. Don't think it needs to be deleted anymore. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 15:50, 21 April 2007 (EDT) | + | * '''Delete''' This page is clearly plagiarized from http://www.xmission.com/~emailbox/chap1.htm. I propose immediate deletion.Love, CML |
− | * I vote for deletion. Irrelevant vanity page. Belongs under [[User:Itscml|Itscml]]'s user page. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 04:40, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | + | * '''Keep''' Page improved. Don't think it needs to be deleted anymore. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 15:50, 21 April 2007 (EDT) |
+ | * '''Delete''' I vote for deletion. Irrelevant vanity page. Belongs under [[User:Itscml|Itscml]]'s user page. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 04:40, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | :'''Keep''' Changing my vote, Pacman's right. He comments a lot on Bwog and I find it useful to know who he is. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 01:55, 10 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
* '''Delete''' because it's a vanity page, as noted by Nonsensical. I'll consider changing my vote if notability is established. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 05:24, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | * '''Delete''' because it's a vanity page, as noted by Nonsensical. I'll consider changing my vote if notability is established. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 05:24, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | * '''Keep''' Don't delete. He's the sports writer for Bwog and his initials are used a lot instead of his name, which is confusing. This might be a good reference. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 15:47, 24 April 2007 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 11:27, 12 May 2007
Nomination for deletion (archived on 5/12/07)
Decision: Keep
- On the fence. It is a vanity page, but so are plenty of others. Not every staff writer for every publication really deserves a page of his/her own, but nor does every member of the Varsity Show. As there are no guidelines beyond our likes/dislikes as to who can and can't have a page, I can't come up with a reason for deleting it that wouldn't include deleting several other pages like it, and this is one of the less offensive ones. I lean towards delete but don't want to start a purge of similar pages without good reason. TenPoints 00:42, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
- Delete This page is clearly plagiarized from http://www.xmission.com/~emailbox/chap1.htm. I propose immediate deletion.Love, CML
- Keep Page improved. Don't think it needs to be deleted anymore. Reaganaut 15:50, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
- Delete I vote for deletion. Irrelevant vanity page. Belongs under Itscml's user page. Nonsensical 04:40, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Keep Changing my vote, Pacman's right. He comments a lot on Bwog and I find it useful to know who he is. Nonsensical 01:55, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
- Delete because it's a vanity page, as noted by Nonsensical. I'll consider changing my vote if notability is established. Reaganaut 05:24, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Keep Don't delete. He's the sports writer for Bwog and his initials are used a lot instead of his name, which is confusing. This might be a good reference. Pacman 15:47, 24 April 2007 (EDT)