Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gabriel Morris"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) |
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Nomination for Deletion == | + | == Nomination for Deletion (archived on 5/12/07) == |
| + | ===Decision: Keep=== | ||
| − | '''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | + | *'''Delete''' --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT) |
| − | + | *<s>'''Delete''' - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)</s> | |
| + | :*'''Keep''' - I think it's acceptable now that it's been cleaned up. And I think the guy is borderline notable. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 03:28, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
*'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | *'''Keep''' - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | *'''Keep''' - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | *'''Delete''' - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?[[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I agree with you, I don't think being CUSJ EiC is that big a deal, but I think a lot of people now know his name because of the CUSJ-Jester feud, so he's notable. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 11:09, 9 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:31, 12 May 2007
Nomination for Deletion (archived on 5/12/07)
Decision: Keep
- Delete --- created as an attack page, presumably as part of the unending jester's cusj campaign. not cool. also exceedingly goddamned tedious. Umlund 02:52, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
Delete - in fact, I think this kind of thing should qualify for 'speedy deletion'. − Reaganaut 03:22, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep - I think it's acceptable now that it's been cleaned up. And I think the guy is borderline notable. − Reaganaut 03:28, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep - I think it's been cleaned up and is now fine Nonsensical 09:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep - I think it's ok... 22:52, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
- Delete - Is it really necessary to have a page for every EiC of every campus publication? Spec, Fed, and B&W editors make sense, but is the CUSJ readership really wide enough for its staff to be considered notable?WhatYouKnowAboutThat 01:31, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
- I agree with you, I don't think being CUSJ EiC is that big a deal, but I think a lot of people now know his name because of the CUSJ-Jester feud, so he's notable. Nonsensical 11:09, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
