Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nick Tenev"

From WikiCU
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
*'''Delete''' - article needs to establish more relevance to campus life. A lot of these vanity pages that popped up today need to be trimmed down to describing their role on campus. I'm a fan of jokey, but this isn't facebook. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
 
*'''Delete''' - article needs to establish more relevance to campus life. A lot of these vanity pages that popped up today need to be trimmed down to describing their role on campus. I'm a fan of jokey, but this isn't facebook. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
 
*'''Keep''' - Frankly, I enjoy these pages. Is there a reason for deletion beyond some arbitrary standard of "notability" or a lack of space (which this page really isn't contributing to)? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 12:50, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
 
*'''Keep''' - Frankly, I enjoy these pages. Is there a reason for deletion beyond some arbitrary standard of "notability" or a lack of space (which this page really isn't contributing to)? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 12:50, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
*'''Keep''' - I know it's borderline, but I think it's just relevant enough to keep. Also, I keep thinking back to Wikipedia - two years ago they would reject articles about "non-notable" high schools, but now they accept an article about any high school. I wonder, why reject "vanity" pages now if we'll end up accepting them within a short time. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 12:01, 19 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:01, 19 May 2007

Nomination for Deletion

  • Delete - article needs to establish more relevance to campus life. A lot of these vanity pages that popped up today need to be trimmed down to describing their role on campus. I'm a fan of jokey, but this isn't facebook. Nonsensical 10:15, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep - Frankly, I enjoy these pages. Is there a reason for deletion beyond some arbitrary standard of "notability" or a lack of space (which this page really isn't contributing to)? Pacman 12:50, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep - I know it's borderline, but I think it's just relevant enough to keep. Also, I keep thinking back to Wikipedia - two years ago they would reject articles about "non-notable" high schools, but now they accept an article about any high school. I wonder, why reject "vanity" pages now if we'll end up accepting them within a short time.  − Reaganaut  12:01, 19 May 2007 (EDT)