Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nonsensical"
(Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please do not make up sorority information. The stuff you have put up about two sororities is inaccurate and biasedSince I was involved in making one of the websites, I am personally offended by you and Tao Tan's continual altering of these statements. Neither sorority protested against the other about something as trivial as a website page designed by the Macintosh program iWeb. The templates are similar because they are just that: Templates. The iWeb template makes the headings in that format. Neither sorority sought to copy the other, it's just "nonsensical." No one even looks at sorority websites before going through recruitment so having a cat-fight over such nonsense would be futile. Again, I wouldn't even care but I helped make one of the websites and it really hurts my feelings that someone went to such great lengths to make it look like the websites were designed specifically to target each other. | ||
Revision as of 09:41, 1 June 2007
|
PrezBo Award | |
| For your many excellent contributions! − Reaganaut 20:15, 19 May 2007 (EDT) |
I rolled back your removal of Tao Tan's credit on a number of articles. This isn't Wikipedia and there's never been any explicit agreement to assume we follow Wikipedia policies. Several administrators felt that Tao deserved credit as the articles represent his original research. Regarding NPOV, pet theories, etc., these are allowed here. We can discuss these policies and specific articles (on talk pages) but do not assume wikipedia rules. Feinstein 17:22, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Please Remove the Website Information from the Sorority Pages
Please do not make up sorority information. The stuff you have put up about two sororities is inaccurate and biasedSince I was involved in making one of the websites, I am personally offended by you and Tao Tan's continual altering of these statements. Neither sorority protested against the other about something as trivial as a website page designed by the Macintosh program iWeb. The templates are similar because they are just that: Templates. The iWeb template makes the headings in that format. Neither sorority sought to copy the other, it's just "nonsensical." No one even looks at sorority websites before going through recruitment so having a cat-fight over such nonsense would be futile. Again, I wouldn't even care but I helped make one of the websites and it really hurts my feelings that someone went to such great lengths to make it look like the websites were designed specifically to target each other.
