Difference between revisions of "User talk:68.110.92.49"
Nateoxford (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Then why don't you change those parts, instead of changing every bloody part of the article? And get a user name. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 17:30, 27 April 2009 (EDT) | Then why don't you change those parts, instead of changing every bloody part of the article? And get a user name. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 17:30, 27 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I hope you didn't learn that laughable interpretation of the libel doctrine at Cornell's law school, or we'd be forced to include it in the article. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 17:32, 27 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:32, 27 April 2009
Blatantly incorrect, and libelous suicide attributions are in no way "tongue and cheek." It is beyond inappropriate: it is actionable.
Then why don't you change those parts, instead of changing every bloody part of the article? And get a user name. Nateoxford 17:30, 27 April 2009 (EDT)
I hope you didn't learn that laughable interpretation of the libel doctrine at Cornell's law school, or we'd be forced to include it in the article. Pacman 17:32, 27 April 2009 (EDT)
