Difference between revisions of "Talk:Barnard College"
Nateoxford (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==other== | ==other== | ||
* Whatever Barnard is, I'm pretty sure it's not a "division". Same with CC, GS, and SEAS. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 20:38, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | * Whatever Barnard is, I'm pretty sure it's not a "division". Same with CC, GS, and SEAS. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 20:38, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ** no way it is not. it is an autonomous entity with which CU has a signed agreement. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 03:47, 7 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *** also i took out "at Columbia University" in the phrase it was founded for female undergraduate students at Columbia University. this makes no sense. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 03:47, 7 October 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 02:47, 7 October 2009
issues
If this is going to be an informative site, let's keep to the facts in the main article. I'm going to move the 'issues' stuff to a specific 'Barnard-Columbia Relationship' article where we can hash out all the details in their full glory. Absentminded 06:41, 9 March 2007 (PST)
trustees?
is there a list of trustees somewhere online? Umlund 03:33, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
other
- Whatever Barnard is, I'm pretty sure it's not a "division". Same with CC, GS, and SEAS. Nateoxford 20:38, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
- no way it is not. it is an autonomous entity with which CU has a signed agreement. Foobar 03:47, 7 October 2009 (EDT)
- also i took out "at Columbia University" in the phrase it was founded for female undergraduate students at Columbia University. this makes no sense. Foobar 03:47, 7 October 2009 (EDT)