Difference between revisions of "Proposals to restructure Columbia University"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | On October 10, 1968, the [[Columbia Spectator]] published a special supplement, entitled ''Restructuring Columbia'', that sought to describe various plans to restructure Columbia's governance and administration structure in the wake of the [[1968 protests]].<ref>[http://www.columbia.edu/cu/senate/information/40th_anniversary/columbia_spectator_10-10-68.pdf Restructuring Columbia], Columbia Spectator, 10 October 1968</ref> Student, faculty, and Trustee working groups all proposed different ideas. At the end of the 1968-1969 academic year, the structure designed and advocated for by the [[Executive Committee of the Faculty]], the [[University Senate]], was submitted for referendum and implemented. The Senate remains today as Columbia's comprehensive governance, legislative, and policy-making body, subject only to the reserve power of the [[Board of Trustees]]. | + | On October 10, 1968, the [[Columbia Spectator]] published a special supplement, entitled ''Restructuring Columbia'', that sought to describe various plans to restructure Columbia's governance and administration structure in the wake of the [[1968 protests]].<ref>[http://www.columbia.edu/cu/senate/information/40th_anniversary/columbia_spectator_10-10-68.pdf Restructuring Columbia], Columbia Spectator, 10 October 1968</ref> Student, faculty, and Trustee working groups all proposed different ideas. At the end of the 1968-1969 academic year, the structure designed and advocated for by the [[Executive Committee of the Faculty]], the [[University Senate]], was submitted for referendum, passed, and implemented by the Board of Trustees. The Senate remains today as Columbia's comprehensive governance, legislative, and policy-making body, subject only to the reserve power of the [[Board of Trustees]]. |
+ | |||
+ | ==Temple Special Committee== | ||
+ | The Temple Special Committee, chaired by Trustee Emeritus Alan H. Temple, oversaw the initial inquiries on restructuring. The Temple Special Committee did not articulate any proposals of its own, but acknowledged the need for restructuring at every level of the University, and articulated the basic principles of participative idea generation that governed the process. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Students for a Restructured University Proposal== | ||
+ | The [[Students for a Restructured University]], a moderate breakaway faction of the [[Students for a Democratic Society]], presented the most comprehensive, far-reaching, and radical proposal for a reform of University governance and administration. It eerily resembled a Qaddafi-esque Jamahiriya of popular committees operating as a direct democracy. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Executive Committee of the Faculty Proposal== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Walsh Committee Proposal== | ||
+ | |||
== References == | == References == |
Revision as of 13:44, 12 April 2011
On October 10, 1968, the Columbia Spectator published a special supplement, entitled Restructuring Columbia, that sought to describe various plans to restructure Columbia's governance and administration structure in the wake of the 1968 protests.[1] Student, faculty, and Trustee working groups all proposed different ideas. At the end of the 1968-1969 academic year, the structure designed and advocated for by the Executive Committee of the Faculty, the University Senate, was submitted for referendum, passed, and implemented by the Board of Trustees. The Senate remains today as Columbia's comprehensive governance, legislative, and policy-making body, subject only to the reserve power of the Board of Trustees.
Contents
Temple Special Committee
The Temple Special Committee, chaired by Trustee Emeritus Alan H. Temple, oversaw the initial inquiries on restructuring. The Temple Special Committee did not articulate any proposals of its own, but acknowledged the need for restructuring at every level of the University, and articulated the basic principles of participative idea generation that governed the process.
Students for a Restructured University Proposal
The Students for a Restructured University, a moderate breakaway faction of the Students for a Democratic Society, presented the most comprehensive, far-reaching, and radical proposal for a reform of University governance and administration. It eerily resembled a Qaddafi-esque Jamahiriya of popular committees operating as a direct democracy.
Executive Committee of the Faculty Proposal
Walsh Committee Proposal
References
- ↑ Restructuring Columbia, Columbia Spectator, 10 October 1968