Difference between revisions of "Reserve Officers Training Corps"
m (→Return of ROTC) |
|||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Image:navyatCU.jpg|right|thumb|[[South Lawn]] becomes a [[w:Field of Mars|Field of Mars]]: naval officers in training]] | [[Image:navyatCU.jpg|right|thumb|[[South Lawn]] becomes a [[w:Field of Mars|Field of Mars]]: naval officers in training]] | ||
| − | '''Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC)''' is a college-based, military officer commissioning program. It is designed as a college elective that focuses on leadership development, problem solving, strategic planning, and professional ethics. | + | '''Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC)''' is a college-based, military officer commissioning program. It is designed as a college elective that focuses on leadership development, problem solving, strategic planning, and professional ethics. The organization has been banned from Columbia's campus since [[1969]]. |
| − | + | ==Departure from Columbia== | |
| − | == Pro- | + | In 1969, a faculty-student commission chaired by [[w:Harvey C. Mansfield, Sr.|Harvey C. Mansfield, Sr.]] made a number of recommendations that, while it did not amount to a ''de jure'' ban, nevertheless created conditions that made the Navy unwilling to continue to sponsor the unit. Conditions included the denial of academic credit for military science and military history courses, the refusal of Columbia to make space and facilities available for ROTC cadets, and the denial of academic titles for ROTC instructors.<ref>http://www.advocatesforrotc.org/columbia/1969committee.html</ref> The Navy then withdrew from Columbia. |
| + | |||
| + | In 1976, a special task force chaired by [[SEAS]] Professor John Tien made recommendations that further affirmed the conclusions of the 1969 Mansfield Commission, and added the stipulation that any decisions about the future of ROTC at Columbia had to be undertaken by the University Senate. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ROTC continues to be available to Columbia students through cross-town programs at [[Fordham University]] (Army) and [[Manhattan College]] (Air Force). Columbia students are technically able to participate in Navy ROTC programs at [[w:State University of New York Maritime College|SUNY Maritime]], but the location is so far as to make it impractical. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many of these technical changes have been rolled back in recent years. Space and facilities are now made available for ROTC cadets to participate in weekly color guard flag-raising and flag-lowering ceremonies, as well as annual commissioning ceremonies. However, as Columbia does not formally participate in ROTC, academic credit and ROTC faculty are still not permitted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Student Affairs]] maintains a [http://www.columbia.edu/cu/rotc website] with information on these programs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Return of ROTC== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Several attempts have been made to restore ROTC to campus. [[University Senate]] votes in the 1970s and mid-2000s both rejected such a move. A [[2008]] student survey on the issue, conducted to guide a discussion and perhaps a renewed vote in the Senate, appeared to have resulted in a narrow rejection for ROTC restoration once again. The results of the survey remain controversial because concerns about voter fraud led almost one third of all votes to be thrown out. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A new process was run in the spring 2011 semester by the University Senate's [[Task Force on Military Engagement]] succeeded in a resolution endorsing senior administration to begin negotiations on the return of ROTC. | ||
| + | |||
| + | On May 26, [[2011]], President Bollinger signed an agreement onboard the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Iwo_Jima_(LHD-7)| USS ''Iwo Jima''] with Naval Secretary Ray Mabus officially allowing the return of a Naval ROTC program to campus.<ref>http://manhattan.ny1.com/content/top_stories/139849/columbia-university-signs-rotc-agreement</ref> The agreement allows the Navy to move into space on campus and would allow students to enroll in a NROTC program that would take place elsewhere in the city. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Pro ROTC-on-campus arguments === | ||
* ROTC Cadets may receive full scholarships, allowing students without means to attend Columbia. | * ROTC Cadets may receive full scholarships, allowing students without means to attend Columbia. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 34: | ||
* Little to no cost to university. | * Little to no cost to university. | ||
| − | == Anti- | + | === Anti ROTC-on-campus arguments === |
* Lack of interest. | * Lack of interest. | ||
* Scholarship opportunities no longer compelling due the changes in financial aid policies. | * Scholarship opportunities no longer compelling due the changes in financial aid policies. | ||
* Military courses are not academically rigorous and do not merit academic credit. | * Military courses are not academically rigorous and do not merit academic credit. | ||
| + | * Columbia students already have the opportunity to participate in ROTC programs elsewhere in New York City. | ||
* Tacit endorsement of warfare has no place in an academic setting. | * Tacit endorsement of warfare has no place in an academic setting. | ||
* ROTC is a costly program. | * ROTC is a costly program. | ||
| − | * Congressional [[:w:Don't Ask Don't Tell|Don't Ask Don't Tell]] law contravenes anti-discrimination policies. | + | * Congressional [[:w:Don't Ask Don't Tell|Don't Ask Don't Tell]] (DADT) law contravenes anti-discrimination policies. |
| + | : This issue in particular has proved to be the sticking point at Columbia. Irrespective of the merits of the program, the university has a stated policy requiring all groups to accept members of any sexual orientation. ROTC does not. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The imminent repeal of DADT may finally put arguments that oppose ROTC on these grounds to rest, though it's unlikely to end opposition to ROTC entirely. | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 54: | ||
* [http://dont.stanford.edu/ Don't Ask Don't Tell Database] | * [http://dont.stanford.edu/ Don't Ask Don't Tell Database] | ||
* [http://www.sldn.org Servicemembers Legal Defense Network] | * [http://www.sldn.org Servicemembers Legal Defense Network] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Special interest clubs]] | [[Category:Special interest clubs]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 27 May 2011
Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) is a college-based, military officer commissioning program. It is designed as a college elective that focuses on leadership development, problem solving, strategic planning, and professional ethics. The organization has been banned from Columbia's campus since 1969.
Contents
Departure from Columbia
In 1969, a faculty-student commission chaired by Harvey C. Mansfield, Sr. made a number of recommendations that, while it did not amount to a de jure ban, nevertheless created conditions that made the Navy unwilling to continue to sponsor the unit. Conditions included the denial of academic credit for military science and military history courses, the refusal of Columbia to make space and facilities available for ROTC cadets, and the denial of academic titles for ROTC instructors.[1] The Navy then withdrew from Columbia.
In 1976, a special task force chaired by SEAS Professor John Tien made recommendations that further affirmed the conclusions of the 1969 Mansfield Commission, and added the stipulation that any decisions about the future of ROTC at Columbia had to be undertaken by the University Senate.
ROTC continues to be available to Columbia students through cross-town programs at Fordham University (Army) and Manhattan College (Air Force). Columbia students are technically able to participate in Navy ROTC programs at SUNY Maritime, but the location is so far as to make it impractical.
Many of these technical changes have been rolled back in recent years. Space and facilities are now made available for ROTC cadets to participate in weekly color guard flag-raising and flag-lowering ceremonies, as well as annual commissioning ceremonies. However, as Columbia does not formally participate in ROTC, academic credit and ROTC faculty are still not permitted.
Student Affairs maintains a website with information on these programs.
Return of ROTC
Several attempts have been made to restore ROTC to campus. University Senate votes in the 1970s and mid-2000s both rejected such a move. A 2008 student survey on the issue, conducted to guide a discussion and perhaps a renewed vote in the Senate, appeared to have resulted in a narrow rejection for ROTC restoration once again. The results of the survey remain controversial because concerns about voter fraud led almost one third of all votes to be thrown out.
A new process was run in the spring 2011 semester by the University Senate's Task Force on Military Engagement succeeded in a resolution endorsing senior administration to begin negotiations on the return of ROTC.
On May 26, 2011, President Bollinger signed an agreement onboard the USS Iwo Jima with Naval Secretary Ray Mabus officially allowing the return of a Naval ROTC program to campus.[2] The agreement allows the Navy to move into space on campus and would allow students to enroll in a NROTC program that would take place elsewhere in the city.
Pro ROTC-on-campus arguments
- ROTC Cadets may receive full scholarships, allowing students without means to attend Columbia.
- ROTC Cadets are guaranteed a job upon graduation.
- Summer internships and other training opportunities.
- Change the armed forces from within by producing Columbia educated officers.
- Students should have the right to attend ROTC classes at Columbia, just as they may at many other schools.
- Little to no cost to university.
Anti ROTC-on-campus arguments
- Lack of interest.
- Scholarship opportunities no longer compelling due the changes in financial aid policies.
- Military courses are not academically rigorous and do not merit academic credit.
- Columbia students already have the opportunity to participate in ROTC programs elsewhere in New York City.
- Tacit endorsement of warfare has no place in an academic setting.
- ROTC is a costly program.
- Congressional Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) law contravenes anti-discrimination policies.
- This issue in particular has proved to be the sticking point at Columbia. Irrespective of the merits of the program, the university has a stated policy requiring all groups to accept members of any sexual orientation. ROTC does not.
The imminent repeal of DADT may finally put arguments that oppose ROTC on these grounds to rest, though it's unlikely to end opposition to ROTC entirely.
External links
- Advocates For ROTC
- Columbia Antiwar Coalition at CSSN
- Columbia ROTC Information Site
- Don't Ask Don't Tell Database
- Servicemembers Legal Defense Network
