Difference between revisions of "ZBT hazing scandal"
Liam Bland (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | In early February of 2013, '''[[Zeta Beta Tau]]'s''' charter was revoked for hazing. Neither the [[InterGreek Council]] nor [[Student Affairs]] has shared any details. Informed rumor has it the the field hockey team was somehow involved, but no action has been taken against them, and [[Columbia Athletics]] has not shared any details. The news will probably never come out definitively. | + | In early February of 2013, '''[[Zeta Beta Tau]]'s''' charter was revoked for hazing. Neither the [[InterGreek Council]] nor [[Student Affairs]] has shared any details. Informed rumor has it the the field hockey team was somehow involved, but no action has been taken against them, and [[Columbia Athletics]] has not shared any details. The news will probably never come out definitively, although IGC members have confirmed that it was egregious and rather disgusting. |
In March 2013, Dean Kevin Shollenberger reversed the Greek Judicial Board's decision to revoke the charter. The fraternity agreed to follow a plan of action drawn up by the University following Shollenberger's decision. | In March 2013, Dean Kevin Shollenberger reversed the Greek Judicial Board's decision to revoke the charter. The fraternity agreed to follow a plan of action drawn up by the University following Shollenberger's decision. |
Revision as of 22:01, 24 April 2013
In early February of 2013, Zeta Beta Tau's charter was revoked for hazing. Neither the InterGreek Council nor Student Affairs has shared any details. Informed rumor has it the the field hockey team was somehow involved, but no action has been taken against them, and Columbia Athletics has not shared any details. The news will probably never come out definitively, although IGC members have confirmed that it was egregious and rather disgusting.
In March 2013, Dean Kevin Shollenberger reversed the Greek Judicial Board's decision to revoke the charter. The fraternity agreed to follow a plan of action drawn up by the University following Shollenberger's decision.