Difference between revisions of "Student-Worker Solidarity"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {| align=center class="current" style="background: #f7f8ff; border: 1px solid #8888aa; padding: .3em; margin-bottom: 3px; font-size: 93%;" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[Image:LogoFavicon.png|30px|]] | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | | '''This article is under construction.'''<br />The contents of this article are undergoing heavy revision<br/>and updating at this time. Please feel free to contribute. | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
{{Infobox club | {{Infobox club | ||
|Name=Student-Worker Solidarity | |Name=Student-Worker Solidarity | ||
| Line 11: | Line 18: | ||
|Contact=studentworkersolidarity@gmail.com}} | |Contact=studentworkersolidarity@gmail.com}} | ||
| − | '''Student-Worker Solidarity''' (often abbreviated SWS) is a labor solidarity group at Columbia. | + | '''Student-Worker Solidarity''' (often abbreviated SWS) is a labor solidarity group at Columbia. SWS organizes students and community members around around specific campaigns for labor rights in the Columbia community. SWS differentiates itself from other campus activist groups by fighting for concrete goals, organizing frequent demonstrations, and maintaining close communication with the workers they fight alongside. |
The mission statement of SWS reads: "We are members of the Columbia community fighting for economic justice. To do so, we strive to | The mission statement of SWS reads: "We are members of the Columbia community fighting for economic justice. To do so, we strive to | ||
| Line 22: | Line 29: | ||
SSBW joined the Barnard 2110 members in their fight for a fair contract, kicking off the campaign with a teach-in attended by over a hundred students. The campaign continued with meetings with administrators, weeks of awareness raising, and a flyering campaign at Founder’s Day. The administration seemed like they were digging in on this fight, even in the face of unprecedented student-worker coalition-building. Then, on October 19th, a month after the first SSBW planning meeting, 2110 members voted to accept a contract that met every one of their demands. All of the hard work was done at the negotiating table, but workers claimed that student support was crucial in giving moral support and putting pressure on the administration. | SSBW joined the Barnard 2110 members in their fight for a fair contract, kicking off the campaign with a teach-in attended by over a hundred students. The campaign continued with meetings with administrators, weeks of awareness raising, and a flyering campaign at Founder’s Day. The administration seemed like they were digging in on this fight, even in the face of unprecedented student-worker coalition-building. Then, on October 19th, a month after the first SSBW planning meeting, 2110 members voted to accept a contract that met every one of their demands. All of the hard work was done at the negotiating table, but workers claimed that student support was crucial in giving moral support and putting pressure on the administration. | ||
===Indus Valley=== | ===Indus Valley=== | ||
| − | After the Barnard workers victory, SSBW underwent the transition to SWS, moving beyond the founding campaign to become a standing solidarity group, but keeping | + | After the Barnard workers victory, SSBW underwent the transition to SWS, moving beyond the founding campaign to become a standing solidarity group, but keeping its commitment to organizing around campaigns in the Columbia community. The next campaign SWS took on was centered on labor law violations at [[Indus Valley]], a local restaurant. A number of workers had filed a lawsuit against the owners of Indus Valley, claiming that they had endured stolen tips, physical abuse, and sub-minimum wage during their employment there. However, the owners stalled and refused to respond to the court's communication. |
| + | |||
| + | SWS organized weekly picket lines at the restaurant for the latter half of the fall semester, attempting to pressure the owners into acknowledging the lawsuit. Finally, in December, the case finally started to move. A ruling was eventually handed down which was reported in the New York Times as historic.<ref>[http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/restaurant-loses-effort-to-have-ex-delivery-workers-suit-dismissed/ "Restaurant Loses Effort to Have Ex-Delivery Workers Suit Dismissed]</ref> | ||
===Faculty House=== | ===Faculty House=== | ||
| + | In the final weeks of the fall semester, SWS started a new campaign around another round of contract negotiations, this time for workers at [[Faculty House]]. The workers, represented by UNITE-HERE Local 100, had been negotiating over a number of workplace problems for months, and decided to seek student support. | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | + | ||
[[Category: Activist clubs]] | [[Category: Activist clubs]] | ||
[[Category: Political clubs]] | [[Category: Political clubs]] | ||
[[Category: SGB groups]] | [[Category: SGB groups]] | ||
Revision as of 17:34, 27 April 2013
|
This article is under construction. The contents of this article are undergoing heavy revision and updating at this time. Please feel free to contribute. |
| Student-Worker Solidarity | |
| |
| Founded: | September 2012 |
| Recognition: | SGB |
| Membership: | ? |
| Executive Board: | Jane Brennan Evan Burger Corin Coetzee Adam Deutsch George Joseph Emilie Segura Becky Simonsen Lizzy Wolozin |
| Category: | Political, Activist |
| Website: | studentworkersolidarity.wordpress.com |
| Contact: | studentworkersolidarity@gmail.com |
Student-Worker Solidarity (often abbreviated SWS) is a labor solidarity group at Columbia. SWS organizes students and community members around around specific campaigns for labor rights in the Columbia community. SWS differentiates itself from other campus activist groups by fighting for concrete goals, organizing frequent demonstrations, and maintaining close communication with the workers they fight alongside.
The mission statement of SWS reads: "We are members of the Columbia community fighting for economic justice. To do so, we strive to promote support and solidarity between students and workers both on our own University campus and outside of its gates."[1]
Contents
Campaigns
Students Support Barnard Workers
SWS was formed in the fall of 2012 under the name Students Support Barnard Workers (SSBW). SSBW was a student support group for the members of UAW Local 2110, which represents dorm access attendants and clerical workers at Barnard as well as workers at Columbia and Teacher’s College, as they fought for a fair contract with Barnard. Barnard President Debora Spar’s administration was demanding a wide array of cutbacks from the workers (including cutting maternity leave), pleading that Barnard was in dire financial straits. The workers argued otherwise, pointing out Barnard could clearly afford lavish new buildings and pay raises for administrators.
SSBW joined the Barnard 2110 members in their fight for a fair contract, kicking off the campaign with a teach-in attended by over a hundred students. The campaign continued with meetings with administrators, weeks of awareness raising, and a flyering campaign at Founder’s Day. The administration seemed like they were digging in on this fight, even in the face of unprecedented student-worker coalition-building. Then, on October 19th, a month after the first SSBW planning meeting, 2110 members voted to accept a contract that met every one of their demands. All of the hard work was done at the negotiating table, but workers claimed that student support was crucial in giving moral support and putting pressure on the administration.
Indus Valley
After the Barnard workers victory, SSBW underwent the transition to SWS, moving beyond the founding campaign to become a standing solidarity group, but keeping its commitment to organizing around campaigns in the Columbia community. The next campaign SWS took on was centered on labor law violations at Indus Valley, a local restaurant. A number of workers had filed a lawsuit against the owners of Indus Valley, claiming that they had endured stolen tips, physical abuse, and sub-minimum wage during their employment there. However, the owners stalled and refused to respond to the court's communication.
SWS organized weekly picket lines at the restaurant for the latter half of the fall semester, attempting to pressure the owners into acknowledging the lawsuit. Finally, in December, the case finally started to move. A ruling was eventually handed down which was reported in the New York Times as historic.[2]
Faculty House
In the final weeks of the fall semester, SWS started a new campaign around another round of contract negotiations, this time for workers at Faculty House. The workers, represented by UNITE-HERE Local 100, had been negotiating over a number of workplace problems for months, and decided to seek student support.
