Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mark Rudd"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
He wasn't expelled? [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:30, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | He wasn't expelled? [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:30, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
: Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | : Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | :: Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. | + | :: Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 07:43, 21 March 2007
He wasn't expelled? Adolph Lewisohn 08:30, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. Ttan 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. Adolph Lewisohn 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
