Difference between revisions of "Columbia Underground Listing of Professor Ability"
m (CULPA moved to Columbia Underground Listing of Professor Ability) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Columbia Underground Listing of Professor Ability''' (CULPA) is a professor ratings site, where students go to praise [[professors]] they like and slag off those they do not. There lies nary a review in between. | The '''Columbia Underground Listing of Professor Ability''' (CULPA) is a professor ratings site, where students go to praise [[professors]] they like and slag off those they do not. There lies nary a review in between. | ||
| − | It was established in 1997 and is not officially affiliated with the university. It allows students to anonymously post their own reviews of their professors. It is regarded as one of the most useful tools for students looking to enroll in a class, boasting over 10,000 reviews. Because of the candid nature of the submissions, the site has occasionally been accused of harboring biased reviews and misrepresenting professors. Still, it is the main source of professor review currently available to the Columbia student body. | + | It was established in [[1997]] and is not officially affiliated with the university. It allows students to anonymously post their own reviews of their professors. It is regarded as one of the most useful tools for students looking to enroll in a class, boasting over 10,000 reviews. Because of the candid nature of the submissions, the site has occasionally been accused of harboring biased reviews and misrepresenting professors. Still, it is the main source of professor review currently available to the Columbia student body. |
Some students are trying to get the administration to set up an official professor review site. | Some students are trying to get the administration to set up an official professor review site. | ||
Revision as of 18:09, 31 March 2007
The Columbia Underground Listing of Professor Ability (CULPA) is a professor ratings site, where students go to praise professors they like and slag off those they do not. There lies nary a review in between.
It was established in 1997 and is not officially affiliated with the university. It allows students to anonymously post their own reviews of their professors. It is regarded as one of the most useful tools for students looking to enroll in a class, boasting over 10,000 reviews. Because of the candid nature of the submissions, the site has occasionally been accused of harboring biased reviews and misrepresenting professors. Still, it is the main source of professor review currently available to the Columbia student body.
Some students are trying to get the administration to set up an official professor review site.
