Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darya Deker"
Stephen.wang (talk | contribs) (New page: *wow. I don't even know what to say about this page ~~~~) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*wow. I don't even know what to say about this page [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 00:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | *wow. I don't even know what to say about this page [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 00:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :*irrelevant/vanity page, propose deletion. Is there a "masturbatory" tag? [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 02:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::*There isn't, but this article would certainly deserve it! [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::*Also, you might want to add the article to [[:Category:Candidates for deletion]]. I'm not inclined to delete it, but if 2 or 3 other people think it should be scrapped, I wouldn't have any objection. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Nomination for deletion == | ||
| + | * '''Neutral''' in the hope that its continued existence will somehow shame the subject. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 05:26, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | * '''Delete''' it seems to be just an inside joke between Darya Deker and CML, which is fine by me, but it belongs on their user pages [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 17:36, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | * '''Neutral''' only because it would be a shame for something that long to get deleted, even if it is stupidly silly. [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 00:11, 25 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, I guess that settled that... [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 12:12, 25 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Indeed. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 12:38, 25 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:38, 25 April 2007
- wow. I don't even know what to say about this page wang 00:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- irrelevant/vanity page, propose deletion. Is there a "masturbatory" tag? Nonsensical 02:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- There isn't, but this article would certainly deserve it! Reaganaut 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Also, you might want to add the article to Category:Candidates for deletion. I'm not inclined to delete it, but if 2 or 3 other people think it should be scrapped, I wouldn't have any objection. Reaganaut 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Nomination for deletion
- Neutral in the hope that its continued existence will somehow shame the subject. Reaganaut 05:26, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Delete it seems to be just an inside joke between Darya Deker and CML, which is fine by me, but it belongs on their user pages Nonsensical 17:36, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Neutral only because it would be a shame for something that long to get deleted, even if it is stupidly silly. wang 00:11, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
Well, I guess that settled that... Nonsensical 12:12, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
- Indeed. Reaganaut 12:38, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
