Difference between revisions of "E. Alex Jung"

From WikiCU
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Views on race)
m
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
{{dir-also|eaj2102}}
 
{{dir-also|eaj2102}}
  
−
'''Eugene Alex Jung''' (usually known as '''E. Alex Jung'''), [[Columbia College|CC]] '07, is an active and well-known student at Columbia, majoring in [[anthropology]]. He served as editor of the [[Ad-Hoc]] magazine, worked as a student advisor on the [[Student Governing Board]], and was a leader in the 2006 [[SHOCC]] demonstrations. Jung has also developed a close personal relationship with [[Jewelnel Davis]], University Chaplain, while working as a Chaplain's Associate.
+
'''Eugene Alex Jung''' (usually known as '''E. Alex Jung''' or 'Alex Jung'), [[Columbia College|CC]] '[[2007|07]], was an active and well-known student at Columbia, majoring in [[anthropology]]. He was a co-founder of [[AdHoc]] magazine and later served as its Editor-in-Chief, Chair of the [[Student Governing Board]], Co-president of the [[Columbia Queer Alliance]], and was a leader in the 2006 [[SHOCC]] demonstrations. Jung has also developed a close personal relationship with [[Jewelnel Davis]], University Chaplain, while working as a Chaplain's Associate.
  
−
Jung writes columns for the [[Spec]]. He is known for expressing viewpoints perceived by many as "radical". Some consider his columns to be similar to those by Nell Geiser, a former Spec columnist.
+
Jung wrote columns for the [[Spec]] that covered a range of topics: free speech, the Columbia administration, hate crimes, gender and sexuality, and the Manhattanville expansion. His columns on race, however, were the most controversial. Some consider his columns to be similar to those by [[Nell Geiser]], a former Spec columnist.
  
 
In a Spectator column on April 26th, 2007, after suggesting that all too often "the responsibility [for facilitating dialogue] falls on marginalized people for not 'reaching out" or being too 'confrontational'", Jung rhetorically offered to "dance for [readers of the Columbia Daily Spectator] kabuki-like with chopsticks in [his] hair".
 
In a Spectator column on April 26th, 2007, after suggesting that all too often "the responsibility [for facilitating dialogue] falls on marginalized people for not 'reaching out" or being too 'confrontational'", Jung rhetorically offered to "dance for [readers of the Columbia Daily Spectator] kabuki-like with chopsticks in [his] hair".
Line 11: Line 11:
 
== Views on race ==
 
== Views on race ==
  
−
Jung believes we live in a "system of whiteness". He believes that some white people, including some of his closest friends, are anti-racist lovers of justice. However, he believes that whites as a group are racist haters of justice.<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "To turn an oft-heard phrase around, some of my closest friends are white. They are anti-racist lovers of justice, wholly non-representative of their group."]</ref> Ironically, these views could in fact be considered as legitimately racist.
+
Jung believes we live in a "system of whiteness". He has written that some white people, including some of his closest friends, are anti-racist lovers of justice. However, he believes that whites as a group are complicit with systemic racism.<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "To turn an oft-heard phrase around, some of my closest friends are white. They are anti-racist lovers of justice, wholly non-representative of their group."]</ref>
 
He believes that white people, as a generalization, are unaware of their supposed privilege<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "It's a generalization, of course, but not a superfluous one to state that white people at Columbia (not only of course) never think about the conditions of their privilege."]</ref> and resistant to discussing race issues<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "Race is not an issue for most white people quite simply because they don't feel its weight. When a critique of white privilege alights on their shoulders, white people quickly cry reverse racism."]</ref>.
 
He believes that white people, as a generalization, are unaware of their supposed privilege<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "It's a generalization, of course, but not a superfluous one to state that white people at Columbia (not only of course) never think about the conditions of their privilege."]</ref> and resistant to discussing race issues<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "Race is not an issue for most white people quite simply because they don't feel its weight. When a critique of white privilege alights on their shoulders, white people quickly cry reverse racism."]</ref>.
  
 
Furthermore, Jung believes that the [[Core Curriculum]] focuses excessively on the ideas and works of white men.<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "Du Bois writes about the deluded Western belief that 'every great thought the world ever knew was a white man's thought.' What better subtitle for the Core Curriculum?"]</ref>
 
Furthermore, Jung believes that the [[Core Curriculum]] focuses excessively on the ideas and works of white men.<ref>[http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/26/Opinion/I.See.White.People-2881501.shtml "Du Bois writes about the deluded Western belief that 'every great thought the world ever knew was a white man's thought.' What better subtitle for the Core Curriculum?"]</ref>
 +
 +
{{succession|preceded=[[Hector Chavez]]|succeeded=[[Sakib Khan]]|office=Chair of the [[Student Governing Board]]|years=2005 - 2006}}
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
Line 42: Line 44:
 
* [http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/23/Opinion/Searching.For.An.Alternative-2873481.shtml Response by Dov Friedman]
 
* [http://media.www.columbiaspectator.com/media/storage/paper865/news/2007/04/23/Opinion/Searching.For.An.Alternative-2873481.shtml Response by Dov Friedman]
  
−
[[Category:Columbia College students|Jung]]
+
[[Category:Columbia College alumni|Jung, Alex]]
 +
[[Category:Class of 2007|Jung, Alex]]
 +
[[Category:Anthropology majors|Jung, Alex]]
 +
[[Category:Student Governing Board Chairs|Jung, Alex]]

Latest revision as of 23:14, 13 May 2013

Alex Jung
See also E. Alex Jung's entry in Columbia's directory.

Eugene Alex Jung (usually known as E. Alex Jung or 'Alex Jung'), CC '07, was an active and well-known student at Columbia, majoring in anthropology. He was a co-founder of AdHoc magazine and later served as its Editor-in-Chief, Chair of the Student Governing Board, Co-president of the Columbia Queer Alliance, and was a leader in the 2006 SHOCC demonstrations. Jung has also developed a close personal relationship with Jewelnel Davis, University Chaplain, while working as a Chaplain's Associate.

Jung wrote columns for the Spec that covered a range of topics: free speech, the Columbia administration, hate crimes, gender and sexuality, and the Manhattanville expansion. His columns on race, however, were the most controversial. Some consider his columns to be similar to those by Nell Geiser, a former Spec columnist.

In a Spectator column on April 26th, 2007, after suggesting that all too often "the responsibility [for facilitating dialogue] falls on marginalized people for not 'reaching out" or being too 'confrontational'", Jung rhetorically offered to "dance for [readers of the Columbia Daily Spectator] kabuki-like with chopsticks in [his] hair".

Views on race

Jung believes we live in a "system of whiteness". He has written that some white people, including some of his closest friends, are anti-racist lovers of justice. However, he believes that whites as a group are complicit with systemic racism.[1] He believes that white people, as a generalization, are unaware of their supposed privilege[2] and resistant to discussing race issues[3].

Furthermore, Jung believes that the Core Curriculum focuses excessively on the ideas and works of white men.[4]

Preceded by
Hector Chavez 		Chair of the Student Governing Board 
2005 - 2006 		Succeeded by
Sakib Khan


References

  1. ↑ "To turn an oft-heard phrase around, some of my closest friends are white. They are anti-racist lovers of justice, wholly non-representative of their group."
  2. ↑ "It's a generalization, of course, but not a superfluous one to state that white people at Columbia (not only of course) never think about the conditions of their privilege."
  3. ↑ "Race is not an issue for most white people quite simply because they don't feel its weight. When a critique of white privilege alights on their shoulders, white people quickly cry reverse racism."
  4. ↑ "Du Bois writes about the deluded Western belief that 'every great thought the world ever knew was a white man's thought.' What better subtitle for the Core Curriculum?"

External links

Jung's Spectator column

2006

2007

Responses to Jung's column

Retrieved from "https://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=E._Alex_Jung&oldid=44968"