Difference between revisions of "Talk:Five pillars theory"

Latest revision as of 20:50, 3 May 2007

Delete/Move - Or at the very least move to the failed attempt at Humor category Nonsensical 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Keep - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "opinions", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "editorializing rhetoric". − Reaganaut 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Delete Umlund 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Move - it can go under Tao Tan, possibly Pacman 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Keep' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. Feinstein 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Keep+Move Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?wang 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Onanism: i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.Umlund 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)

Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template. − Reaganaut 14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)

Since when is Amherst a university?

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 *'''Move''' - it can go under [[Tao Tan]], possibly [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 18:32, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 *'''Keep'''' This isn't wikipedia, so pet theories are fair game. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 17:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
+*'''Keep'''+'''Move''' Can we put it under a category like "student pontifications and masturbations"?[[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 22:06, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
+*'''Onanism''': i think we need to make an 'onanism' template, and this can be the first (of many) proud recipients.[[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 13:49, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
+:*Excellent suggestion! Although a category would be more appropriate than a template. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:04, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
+'''Since when is Amherst a university?'''