Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Fraternities and sororities"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:This was some sort of compromise from the early days of the site. I can't remember how it came about. Anyway, I can't think of any reason just now to have a "Fraternities and sororities" category, so I suggest we get rid of it. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 21:06, 22 May 2007 (EDT) | :This was some sort of compromise from the early days of the site. I can't remember how it came about. Anyway, I can't think of any reason just now to have a "Fraternities and sororities" category, so I suggest we get rid of it. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 21:06, 22 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Sounds good to me. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 21:10, 22 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Nomination for deletion == | ||
| + | *'''Delete''' - category is redundant. (See above discussion.) {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 21:17, 22 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:17, 22 May 2007
What's the rationale of categorizing all sororities as "Sororities" and "Fraternities and Sororities"? Nonsensical 21:02, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
- This was some sort of compromise from the early days of the site. I can't remember how it came about. Anyway, I can't think of any reason just now to have a "Fraternities and sororities" category, so I suggest we get rid of it. − Reaganaut 21:06, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
- Sounds good to me. Nonsensical 21:10, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
Nomination for deletion
- Delete - category is redundant. (See above discussion.) − Reaganaut 21:17, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
