Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of 2004 graduates"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) (New page: Would this make more sense as a category instead? That way the graduation year would be controlled from within each person's article. --~~~~) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would this make more sense as a category instead? That way the graduation year would be controlled from within each person's article. --[[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 21:28, 11 July 2007 (EDT) | Would this make more sense as a category instead? That way the graduation year would be controlled from within each person's article. --[[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 21:28, 11 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I think it might. It should also be structured so that there's a metacategory by year for each school. So, for example, there would be a category for "Columbia College Class of 2007" which would, in turn, be placed in a "2007 graduates" category and a "Columbia College alumni" category(this would even eliminate the necessity of switching each class over from "students" to "alumni"; only the categories would have to be renamed). [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 11:14, 12 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::I like Pacman's idea. It's very elegant. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 17:40, 12 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, 12 July 2007
Would this make more sense as a category instead? That way the graduation year would be controlled from within each person's article. --Nonsensical 21:28, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
- I think it might. It should also be structured so that there's a metacategory by year for each school. So, for example, there would be a category for "Columbia College Class of 2007" which would, in turn, be placed in a "2007 graduates" category and a "Columbia College alumni" category(this would even eliminate the necessity of switching each class over from "students" to "alumni"; only the categories would have to be renamed). Pacman 11:14, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
- I like Pacman's idea. It's very elegant. − Reaganaut 17:40, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
