Difference between revisions of "Gayatri C. Spivak"

From WikiCU
Jump to: navigation, search
(no need to give both the highlights and full content of linked-to letter)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{wp-also2|Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak}}
 
{{wp-also2|Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak}}
 
{{dir-also|gcs4}}
 
{{dir-also|gcs4}}
{{culpa-also|476}}
 
  
'''Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak''' is a vociferous literary critic who was named a [[University Professor]] in March [[2007]]. She is also a founder of the [[Institute for Comparative Literature and Society]], a participant in elementary and intermediate [[Chinese]] classes, and an occasional instructor, on leave in Spring [[2008]].
+
'''Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak''' is a vociferous literary critic who was named a [[University Professor]] in March [[2007]]. She is also a founder of the [[Institute for Comparative Literature and Society]], a participant in elementary and intermediate [[Chinese]] classes, and an occasional instructor.
  
She is a noted scholar on the ideas of [[:w:Jacques_Derrida|Jacques Derrida]], and is known for helping found the discipline of [[Postcolonialism]] altogether, particularly the concept of the [[:w:Subaltern_(postcolonialism)|subaltern]].  
+
She is a noted expert and translator of the ideas of [[:w:Jacques_Derrida|Jacques Derrida]], and is known for helping found the discipline of [[postcolonialism]] altogether, particularly the concept of the [[:w:Subaltern_(postcolonialism)|subaltern]].<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZHH4ALRFHw</ref> She has also been name-checked in a song by electro-punk band Le Tigre.  
  
 
== Criticism ==
 
== Criticism ==
She has been criticised for using "unreadable jargon" and forcing a false dichotomy between "white, Western, imperialist males" and "designated, politically correct victims" on her opponents to bludgeon them into submission. <ref>http://www.columbia.edu/cu/alumni/Magazine/Summer2007/Letters.html</ref>
+
 
 +
Some students have found Spivak's methods of instruction arbitrary, capricious, and vain. One attempt to team-teach a course with [[Hamid Dabashi]] led to legendarily disastrous results.<ref>http://www.culpa.info/?root=csearch&process=browse&target=INTRO%2520TO%2520COMP%2520LIT%2520%26%2520SOCIETY%2520Call%2520Number%252048458%2520</ref>
 +
 
 +
Her scholarship has been criticized for using "unreadable jargon" and forcing a false dichotomy between "white, Western, imperialist males" and "designated, politically correct victims" on her opponents to bludgeon them into submission. <ref>http://www.columbia.edu/cu/alumni/Magazine/Summer2007/Letters.html</ref>
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
Line 21: Line 22:
 
[[Category:University Professors|Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty]]
 
[[Category:University Professors|Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty]]
 
[[Category:English professors|Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty]]
 
[[Category:English professors|Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty]]
[[Category:South Asian studies|Spivak]]
+
[[Category:Postcolonialists|Spivak]]

Latest revision as of 19:55, 9 May 2024

Gayatri C. Spivak
See also Wikipedia's article about "Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak".
See also Gayatri C. Spivak's entry in Columbia's directory.

Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak is a vociferous literary critic who was named a University Professor in March 2007. She is also a founder of the Institute for Comparative Literature and Society, a participant in elementary and intermediate Chinese classes, and an occasional instructor.

She is a noted expert and translator of the ideas of Jacques Derrida, and is known for helping found the discipline of postcolonialism altogether, particularly the concept of the subaltern.[1] She has also been name-checked in a song by electro-punk band Le Tigre.

Criticism

Some students have found Spivak's methods of instruction arbitrary, capricious, and vain. One attempt to team-teach a course with Hamid Dabashi led to legendarily disastrous results.[2]

Her scholarship has been criticized for using "unreadable jargon" and forcing a false dichotomy between "white, Western, imperialist males" and "designated, politically correct victims" on her opponents to bludgeon them into submission. [3]

References

External links