Difference between revisions of "Talk:Barnard College"
Absentminded (talk | contribs) (New page: If this is going to be an informative site, let's keep to the facts in the main article. I'm going to move the 'issues' stuff to a specific 'Barnard-Columbia Relationship' article where we...) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == issues == | ||
If this is going to be an informative site, let's keep to the facts in the main article. I'm going to move the 'issues' stuff to a specific 'Barnard-Columbia Relationship' article where we can hash out all the details in their full glory. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 06:41, 9 March 2007 (PST) | If this is going to be an informative site, let's keep to the facts in the main article. I'm going to move the 'issues' stuff to a specific 'Barnard-Columbia Relationship' article where we can hash out all the details in their full glory. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 06:41, 9 March 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == trustees? == | ||
| + | is there a list of trustees somewhere online? [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 03:33, 5 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==other== | ||
| + | * Whatever Barnard is, I'm pretty sure it's not a "division". Same with CC, GS, and SEAS. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 20:38, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ** no way it is not. it is an autonomous entity with which CU has a signed agreement. HOWEVER cc, gs, and seas are divisions of CU. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 03:50, 7 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *** also i took out "at Columbia University" in the phrase it was founded for female undergraduate students at Columbia University. this makes no sense. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 03:47, 7 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | **** even if it were legally accurate there was no such thing as "columbia university" until 1896, 7 yrs after 1889, barnard's founding (data from wikipedia) [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 03:49, 7 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:50, 7 October 2009
issues
If this is going to be an informative site, let's keep to the facts in the main article. I'm going to move the 'issues' stuff to a specific 'Barnard-Columbia Relationship' article where we can hash out all the details in their full glory. Absentminded 06:41, 9 March 2007 (PST)
trustees?
is there a list of trustees somewhere online? Umlund 03:33, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
other
- Whatever Barnard is, I'm pretty sure it's not a "division". Same with CC, GS, and SEAS. Nateoxford 20:38, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
- no way it is not. it is an autonomous entity with which CU has a signed agreement. HOWEVER cc, gs, and seas are divisions of CU. Foobar 03:50, 7 October 2009 (EDT)
- also i took out "at Columbia University" in the phrase it was founded for female undergraduate students at Columbia University. this makes no sense. Foobar 03:47, 7 October 2009 (EDT)
- even if it were legally accurate there was no such thing as "columbia university" until 1896, 7 yrs after 1889, barnard's founding (data from wikipedia) Foobar 03:49, 7 October 2009 (EDT)
