Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boston Red Sox"
Nateoxford (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
uhh...ideas about how to categorize this? maybe we should just consolidate it with [[Boston]] [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 02:32, 28 April 2009 (EDT) | uhh...ideas about how to categorize this? maybe we should just consolidate it with [[Boston]] [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 02:32, 28 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | - We could create a new catch-all "baseball" category, in which we put the stadiums, teams, and players. Conversely we could consolidate the Red Sox and Phillies articles into their respective cities, although I do not prefer this. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 05:45, 28 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Maybe a pro sports category to catch any other potential non-Columbia sports articles? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 11:02, 28 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That sounds good to me. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 11:54, 28 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:54, 28 April 2009
uhh...ideas about how to categorize this? maybe we should just consolidate it with Boston Pacman 02:32, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
- We could create a new catch-all "baseball" category, in which we put the stadiums, teams, and players. Conversely we could consolidate the Red Sox and Phillies articles into their respective cities, although I do not prefer this. Nateoxford 05:45, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
Maybe a pro sports category to catch any other potential non-Columbia sports articles? Pacman 11:02, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
That sounds good to me. Nateoxford 11:54, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
