Difference between revisions of "User talk:Certaldo"
Nateoxford (talk | contribs) (New page: In my opinion, Barnard is not a "division." If you can convince me of otherwise, then we will let your latest revision stand. Please explain why you insist on using the "division" termin...) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In my opinion, Barnard is not a "division." If you can convince me of otherwise, then we will let your latest revision stand. Please explain why you insist on using the "division" terminology. Don't forget, the [[Barnard]] main page is meant to be as factual as possible. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 23:17, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | + | In my opinion, Barnard is not a "division." If you can convince me of otherwise, then we will let your latest revision stand. Please explain why you insist on using the "division" terminology. Don't forget, the [[Barnard College]] main page is meant to be as factual as possible. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 23:17, 6 October 2009 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | * it is absolutely not a division. it is an affiliate, ie an autonomous institution with which CU has a signed agreement. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 03:42, 7 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:42, 7 October 2009
In my opinion, Barnard is not a "division." If you can convince me of otherwise, then we will let your latest revision stand. Please explain why you insist on using the "division" terminology. Don't forget, the Barnard College main page is meant to be as factual as possible. Nateoxford 23:17, 6 October 2009 (EDT)
- it is absolutely not a division. it is an affiliate, ie an autonomous institution with which CU has a signed agreement. Foobar 03:42, 7 October 2009 (EDT)
