Difference between revisions of "Talk:Investment banking"
(New page: Fantastic article. Couldn't be written by a more appropriate editor. ~~~~) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I've started improving this article and the article about [[investment banks]], making them more useful/serious. I'll improve on them later this evening or in a day or so. After this summer I should be able to improve them considerably further, at least in the areas pertaining to the IBD. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 13:41, 11 June 2007 (EDT) | |
| + | |||
| + | How up to date is this article? Is there still investment banking at this point? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 20:39, 21 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | :It's still pretty up-to-date. Investment banking is still around! The compensation section is outdated though - but maybe not for Goldman! [[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:11, 22 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Haha re: Goldman. As an expert, can you update the compensation section for the rest? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 20:25, 23 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 23 July 2009
I've started improving this article and the article about investment banks, making them more useful/serious. I'll improve on them later this evening or in a day or so. After this summer I should be able to improve them considerably further, at least in the areas pertaining to the IBD. − Reaganaut 13:41, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
How up to date is this article? Is there still investment banking at this point? Pacman 20:39, 21 July 2009 (EDT)
