Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mark Rudd"
(New page: He wasn't expelled? ~~~~) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
He wasn't expelled? [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:30, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | He wasn't expelled? [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:30, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | : Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | :: Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | ::: Not a huge fan of big wiki when it comes to CU history.[[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 08:52, 21 March 2007 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 07:53, 21 March 2007
He wasn't expelled? Adolph Lewisohn 08:30, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. Ttan 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. Adolph Lewisohn 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- Not a huge fan of big wiki when it comes to CU history.Ttan 08:52, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. Adolph Lewisohn 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT)