Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mark Rudd"

From WikiCU
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
: Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
: Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. [[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM  Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM  Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. [[User:Adolph Lewisohn|Adolph Lewisohn]] 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
::: Not a huge fan of big wiki when it comes to CU history.[[User:Ttan|Ttan]] 08:52, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 07:53, 21 March 2007

He wasn't expelled? Adolph Lewisohn 08:30, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Nope. Part of the agreement that the ECFAS worked out was that there would be no retaliation for students. Rudd left, as did all his compatriots. Ttan 08:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Ah. Here we go: Sunday, April 28 - 11:00 AM Ad Hoc Faculty endorse “bitter pill” resolution supporting collective punishment, which would see no one expelled. Looks like the big wiki got this one wrong. Adolph Lewisohn 08:43, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Not a huge fan of big wiki when it comes to CU history.Ttan 08:52, 21 March 2007 (EDT)