Difference between revisions of "Talk:Columbia 250"
(New page: Unless anyone objects, I'm going to remove the link to Spectacular Failure (which appears to be an old Fed/Jester article on grading papers?) as it doesn't quite relate. ~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Unless anyone objects, I'm going to remove the link to [[Spectacular Failure]] (which appears to be an old Fed/Jester article on grading papers?) as it doesn't quite relate. [[User:Moph|Moph]] 09:31, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | Unless anyone objects, I'm going to remove the link to [[Spectacular Failure]] (which appears to be an old Fed/Jester article on grading papers?) as it doesn't quite relate. [[User:Moph|Moph]] 09:31, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==1989== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why did they celebrate the 200th in 1989? It seems like they already had some proper celebrations in 1954... [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 17:58, 30 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 30 May 2007
Unless anyone objects, I'm going to remove the link to Spectacular Failure (which appears to be an old Fed/Jester article on grading papers?) as it doesn't quite relate. Moph 09:31, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
1989
Why did they celebrate the 200th in 1989? It seems like they already had some proper celebrations in 1954... Pacman 17:58, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
