Difference between revisions of "Reserve Officers Training Corps"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{wp-also}} | {{wp-also}} | ||
− | ' | + | Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) is a college-based, military officer commissioning program. It is designed as a college elective that focuses on leadership development, problem solving, strategic planning, and professional ethics. It is currently banned from Columbia, though it is available to Columbia students through cross-town programs at [[Fordham University]] (Army) and Manhattan College (Air Force). Columbia [[Student Affairs]] maintains a [http://www.columbia.edu/cu/rotc website] with information on these programs. |
== Pro-ROTC arguments == | == Pro-ROTC arguments == |
Revision as of 22:18, 29 April 2007
Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) is a college-based, military officer commissioning program. It is designed as a college elective that focuses on leadership development, problem solving, strategic planning, and professional ethics. It is currently banned from Columbia, though it is available to Columbia students through cross-town programs at Fordham University (Army) and Manhattan College (Air Force). Columbia Student Affairs maintains a website with information on these programs.
Pro-ROTC arguments
- ROTC Cadets may receive full scholarships, allowing students without means to attend Columbia.
- ROTC Cadets are guaranteed a job upon graduation.
- Summer internships and other training opportunities.
- Change the armed forces from within by producing Columbia educated officers.
- Students should have the right to attend ROTC classes at Columbia, just as they may at many other schools.
- Little to no cost to university.
Anti-ROTC arguments
- Lack of interest.
- Scholarship opportunities no longer compelling due the changes in financial aid policies.
- Military courses are not academically rigorous and do not merit academic credit.
- Tacit endorsement of warfare has no place in an academic setting.
- ROTC is a costly program.
- Congressional Don't Ask Don't Tell law contravenes anti-discrimination policies.