Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Economics courses"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I must be a really savvy econ major! :) | :I must be a really savvy econ major! :) | ||
:I saw that Feinstein added the course titles. I removed the course numbers. It's a choice between course titles or numbers. Having both shouldn't be an option. That would be too complicated. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 17:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | :I saw that Feinstein added the course titles. I removed the course numbers. It's a choice between course titles or numbers. Having both shouldn't be an option. That would be too complicated. {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 17:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Having both (with numbers first) would allow the courses to organize themselves as the departments do, hierarchically. If forced to choose, though, names are better. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 17:30, 4 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 4 May 2007
This category is a good illustration of how names for course titles would be useful. Add them to the back end of the number, and the courses are organized, but also described. Currently, it's impossible to know the difference between these by looking at the list alone (unless you're a really savvy econ major). Pacman 17:00, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- I must be a really savvy econ major! :)
- I saw that Feinstein added the course titles. I removed the course numbers. It's a choice between course titles or numbers. Having both shouldn't be an option. That would be too complicated. − Reaganaut 17:21, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
- Having both (with numbers first) would allow the courses to organize themselves as the departments do, hierarchically. If forced to choose, though, names are better. Pacman 17:30, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
