Difference between revisions of "Talk:Global Core"

Revision as of 05:18, 20 May 2007

POV: I took ASCE 2002 with de Bary and quite frankly, it was the most dense but also the most informative course I've ever taken. If you are capable of doing all the readings (and it was quite heavy, about 200-400 pp per week; someone on CULPA compared it to "keeping up with a 747"), then you will learn a lot about China and Japan, admittedly less about Korea. Also, most sections of ASCE 2002 are huge. De Bary only takes around 20 or so students.Ttan 06:18, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:18, 20 May 2007 (view source) Ttan (talk \| contribs) (New page: *POV: I took ASCE 2002 with de Bary and quite frankly, it was the most dense but also the most informative course I've ever taken. If you are capable of doing all the readings (and it was ...)		Revision as of 05:18, 20 May 2007 (view source) Ttan (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	*POV: I took ASCE 2002 with de Bary and quite frankly, it was the most dense but also the most informative course I've ever taken. If you are capable of doing all the readings (and it was quite heavy, about 200-400 pp per week; someone on CULPA compared it to "keeping up with a 747"), then you will learn a lot about China and Japan, admittedly less about Korea. Also, most sections of ASCE 2002 are huge. De Bary only takes around 20 or so students.	+	*POV: I took ASCE 2002 with de Bary and quite frankly, it was the most dense but also the most informative course I've ever taken. If you are capable of doing all the readings (and it was quite heavy, about 200-400 pp per week; someone on CULPA compared it to "keeping up with a 747"), then you will learn a lot about China and Japan, admittedly less about Korea. Also, most sections of ASCE 2002 are huge. De Bary only takes around 20 or so students.[[User:Ttan\|Ttan]] 06:18, 20 May 2007 (EDT)