Difference between revisions of "User talk:Reaganaut"
(→spam from nonregistered users) |
(→spam from nonregistered users) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:Yes, I've seen all that spam. I think I ''will'' disable edits by unregistered users, but first, does anyone else have an opinion about this? {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 09:06, 2 June 2007 (EDT) | :Yes, I've seen all that spam. I think I ''will'' disable edits by unregistered users, but first, does anyone else have an opinion about this? {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 09:06, 2 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::As long as we monitor the site, I think unregistered users should be able to make edits. [[User:WhatYouKnowAboutThat|WhatYouKnowAboutThat]] 07:51, 4 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:51, 4 June 2007
Restaurant articles
Hey, maybe we could try integrating this into restaurant articles? http://wikicu.com/Template:Infobox_restaurant
Also, thanks for cleaning up my grammar! Absentminded 11:37, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Eskin
- I agree! Pacman 14:01, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
inserting a colon before "Category" so that this redirect page doesn't appear in the category
Oooooh! So that's how you do that. Can you recommend a good tutorial on MediaWiki? I looked at their manual and found it hard to find what I wanted. Nonsensical 14:34, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
- Unfortunately I don't know of any good MediaWiki guides... Everything I know, I learned here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Editing That's probably the guide you were referring to though. − Reaganaut 14:48, 12 May 2007 (EDT)
Haha, thanks for the PrezBo, Reaganaut. Tis a great honor. Nonsensical 20:18, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
N Suicide; 04:02 . . (+22) . . Reaganaut
Reaganaut, I notice you're editing the Suicide article at 4 in the morning. Is there something we need to talk about? Nonsensical 04:06, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
- Ah, but it's 9:07am for me! Nothing to worry about at all :) − Reaganaut 04:08, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
spam from nonregistered users
edits by the nonregistered was enabled a few weeks ago. this seems to be highly correlated with:
- sorority shenanegans and
- viagra/vioxx spam.
i therefore request disabling edits without registering. 128.59.150.168 11:37, 1 June 2007 (EDT)
- mmmm, irony. --216.6.170.21 00:05, 2 June 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, I've seen all that spam. I think I will disable edits by unregistered users, but first, does anyone else have an opinion about this? − Reaganaut 09:06, 2 June 2007 (EDT)
- As long as we monitor the site, I think unregistered users should be able to make edits. WhatYouKnowAboutThat 07:51, 4 June 2007 (EDT)
