Difference between revisions of "Talk:WikiNode"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) (New page: == Comparison == Just thought it might be interesting to see how we compare to our neighbors (as of 7/8/07): center|600px [[Image:GraphComparePageViews...) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
These statistics are pretty interesting, though weird in places. It's cool that we're #2 in legitimate content pages and at the rate we're going, we're on track to be #1 within months. It's pretty strange that Williams has so many hits. Maybe it was attacked by some kind of automated bot, because it's bizarre that such little content drew 3 million viewers. --[[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 14:24, 8 July 2007 (EDT) | These statistics are pretty interesting, though weird in places. It's cool that we're #2 in legitimate content pages and at the rate we're going, we're on track to be #1 within months. It's pretty strange that Williams has so many hits. Maybe it was attacked by some kind of automated bot, because it's bizarre that such little content drew 3 million viewers. --[[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 14:24, 8 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Very interesting statistics. Thanks! {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 19:11, 8 July 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 18:11, 8 July 2007
Comparison
Just thought it might be interesting to see how we compare to our neighbors (as of 7/8/07):
Case-Western excluded from user comparison because they blow away everyone, though this is because they automatically registered thousands of students
These statistics are pretty interesting, though weird in places. It's cool that we're #2 in legitimate content pages and at the rate we're going, we're on track to be #1 within months. It's pretty strange that Williams has so many hits. Maybe it was attacked by some kind of automated bot, because it's bizarre that such little content drew 3 million viewers. --Nonsensical 14:24, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
- Very interesting statistics. Thanks! − Reaganaut 19:11, 8 July 2007 (EDT)