Difference between revisions of "Talk:Manhattanville controversy"
Absentminded (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How is the Expansion a Scandal??[[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | How is the Expansion a Scandal??[[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
: That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | : That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. [[User:Feinstein|Feinstein]] 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way. | ||
Revision as of 22:57, 19 March 2007
How is the Expansion a Scandal??Absentminded 22:00, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- That really depends on who you ask. I'm pretty sure an opponent of it would brand it a scandal. Feinstein 23:46, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- The expansion plan itself isnt a scandal, however, it is controversial, and there's a difference. A 'scandal' (using the term broadly) would be the various embarrassing episodes chronicled by the Spectator along the way.
