Difference between revisions of "Talk:Columbia-Barnard relationship"
Absentminded (talk | contribs) |
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is far too much text before the table of contents. To whoever wrote it... please break it down! [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 11:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | There is far too much text before the table of contents. To whoever wrote it... please break it down! [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 11:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
:*I've edited this about a half dozen times, and I think it finally makes some sense, though it's still a bit partisan (I plan on working on that more later). I can't think of a good way to break it down. Isn't there a wiki-command for moving the ToC to the top of the article? [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 12:36, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | :*I've edited this about a half dozen times, and I think it finally makes some sense, though it's still a bit partisan (I plan on working on that more later). I can't think of a good way to break it down. Isn't there a wiki-command for moving the ToC to the top of the article? [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 12:36, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''NPOV Dispute''': This is a page that's really important to keep as factual as possible and not promote any sort of agenda of what Barnard ''should'' do. Most of it does a pretty good job of this, but the petty nitpicking is mostly first person from a writer who is just advocating his own views on what should change at Barnard. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:09, 9 April 2007
There is far too much text before the table of contents. To whoever wrote it... please break it down! Reaganaut 11:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
- I've edited this about a half dozen times, and I think it finally makes some sense, though it's still a bit partisan (I plan on working on that more later). I can't think of a good way to break it down. Isn't there a wiki-command for moving the ToC to the top of the article? Absentminded 12:36, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
NPOV Dispute: This is a page that's really important to keep as factual as possible and not promote any sort of agenda of what Barnard should do. Most of it does a pretty good job of this, but the petty nitpicking is mostly first person from a writer who is just advocating his own views on what should change at Barnard. Nonsensical 13:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
