Difference between revisions of "Talk:Philolexian Society"
(New page: Is it really appropriate to call it "one of the oldest" when it's current incarnation was started only twenty years ago?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is it really appropriate to call it "one of the oldest" when it's current incarnation was started only twenty years ago? | Is it really appropriate to call it "one of the oldest" when it's current incarnation was started only twenty years ago? | ||
| + | :* Is it really appropriate to posit Columbia as being 253 years old, when 1) it did not exist between 1776-1784, and 2) its present form was not chartered until 1787? | ||
Revision as of 20:27, 11 April 2007
Is it really appropriate to call it "one of the oldest" when it's current incarnation was started only twenty years ago?
- Is it really appropriate to posit Columbia as being 253 years old, when 1) it did not exist between 1776-1784, and 2) its present form was not chartered until 1787?
