Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reserve Officers Training Corps"

Revision as of 02:48, 23 April 2007

Why was this removed " Credit for courses is not a requirement for the establishment of a program" ? Is that not true? wang 01:47, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

I didn't remove it, but maybe because that's not a "pro-ROTC argument". It's more of a "it wouldn't be too much trouble to bring back ROTC" argument. Reaganaut 03:48, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:47, 23 April 2007 (view source) Stephen.wang (talk \| contribs) (New page: *Why was this removed " Credit for courses is not a requirement for the establishment of a program" ? Is that not true? ~~~~)		Revision as of 02:48, 23 April 2007 (view source) Reaganaut (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*Why was this removed " Credit for courses is not a requirement for the establishment of a program" ? Is that not true? [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 01:47, 23 April 2007 (EDT)		*Why was this removed " Credit for courses is not a requirement for the establishment of a program" ? Is that not true? [[User:Stephen.wang\|wang]] 01:47, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
		+	:*I didn't remove it, but maybe because that's not a "pro-ROTC argument". It's more of a "it wouldn't be too much trouble to bring back ROTC" argument. [[User:Reaganaut\|Reaganaut]] 03:48, 23 April 2007 (EDT)