Difference between revisions of "Talk:Darya Deker"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::*There isn't, but this article would certainly deserve it! [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ::*There isn't, but this article would certainly deserve it! [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
::*Also, you might want to add the article to [[:Category:Candidates for deletion]]. I'm not inclined to delete it, but if 2 or 3 other people think it should be scrapped, I wouldn't have any objection. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ::*Also, you might want to add the article to [[:Category:Candidates for deletion]]. I'm not inclined to delete it, but if 2 or 3 other people think it should be scrapped, I wouldn't have any objection. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Nomination for deletion == | ||
| + | * '''Neutral''' in the hope that its continued existence will somehow shame the subject. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 05:26, 24 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:26, 24 April 2007
- wow. I don't even know what to say about this page wang 00:52, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- irrelevant/vanity page, propose deletion. Is there a "masturbatory" tag? Nonsensical 02:11, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- There isn't, but this article would certainly deserve it! Reaganaut 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- Also, you might want to add the article to Category:Candidates for deletion. I'm not inclined to delete it, but if 2 or 3 other people think it should be scrapped, I wouldn't have any objection. Reaganaut 03:59, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
Nomination for deletion
- Neutral in the hope that its continued existence will somehow shame the subject. Reaganaut 05:26, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
