Difference between revisions of "Talk:E. Alex Jung"
(New page: This is a clear breach of neutrality, and reflects a biased opinion. To see that the page was created by such a significant contributor (reaganaut) poses serious questions about the nature...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is a clear breach of neutrality, and reflects a biased opinion. To see that the page was created by such a significant contributor (reaganaut) poses serious questions about the nature of this wiki and the people who purport to be creating it. What is more, the information posted on Alex Jung is hurtful and seems like a personal attack grounded in animosity. --[[User:Sbr2113|Sbr2113]] 11:49, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | This is a clear breach of neutrality, and reflects a biased opinion. To see that the page was created by such a significant contributor (reaganaut) poses serious questions about the nature of this wiki and the people who purport to be creating it. What is more, the information posted on Alex Jung is hurtful and seems like a personal attack grounded in animosity. --[[User:Sbr2113|Sbr2113]] 11:49, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | : Neutrality has never been a WikiCU goal. If it were, we'd never be able to have restaurant reviews, for example. As for my edits... He ''does'' hate whites, if you care to read his Spec columns. And his columns ''are'' shitty. Oh, and he ''is'' a radical. [[User:Reaganaut|Reaganaut]] 11:55, 26 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:55, 26 April 2007
This is a clear breach of neutrality, and reflects a biased opinion. To see that the page was created by such a significant contributor (reaganaut) poses serious questions about the nature of this wiki and the people who purport to be creating it. What is more, the information posted on Alex Jung is hurtful and seems like a personal attack grounded in animosity. --Sbr2113 11:49, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
- Neutrality has never been a WikiCU goal. If it were, we'd never be able to have restaurant reviews, for example. As for my edits... He does hate whites, if you care to read his Spec columns. And his columns are shitty. Oh, and he is a radical. Reaganaut 11:55, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
