Difference between revisions of "Talk:Five pillars theory"
Nonsensical (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Nomination for Deletion == | == Nomination for Deletion == | ||
| − | *'''Delete''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT) | + | *'''Delete/Move''' - Or at the very least move to the ''failed attempt at Humor'' category [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT) |
*'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT) | *'''Keep''' - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "[[:Category:Opinions|opinions]]", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "[http://www.wikicu.com/index.php?title=Undergraduate_business_program&curid=3229&diff=12455&oldid=12442 editorializing rhetoric]". {{User:Reaganaut/sig}} 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | * | + | *'''Delete''' [[User:Umlund|Umlund]] 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 17:08, 1 May 2007
Nomination for Deletion
- Delete/Move - Or at the very least move to the failed attempt at Humor category Nonsensical 13:33, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Keep - I think it's an interesting theory, though of course it's entirely unoriginal and Tao is rather pompous in claiming it as his own. Nevertheless, I agree that it's in the wrong category. I propose we move it to new "opinions", "editorials", or "opinion pieces" category. Personally, I'd appreciate such a category as an outlet for my occasional "editorializing rhetoric". − Reaganaut 14:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
- Delete Umlund 17:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
