Difference between revisions of "Talk:Columbia-Barnard relationship"
Stephen.wang (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
'''NPOV Dispute''': This is a page that's really important to keep as factual as possible and not promote any sort of agenda of what Barnard ''should'' do. Most of it does a pretty good job of this, but the petty nitpicking is mostly first person from a writer who is just advocating his own views on what should change at Barnard. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | '''NPOV Dispute''': This is a page that's really important to keep as factual as possible and not promote any sort of agenda of what Barnard ''should'' do. Most of it does a pretty good job of this, but the petty nitpicking is mostly first person from a writer who is just advocating his own views on what should change at Barnard. [[User:Nonsensical|Nonsensical]] 13:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
:These "shoulds" ought to be corralled in a section on "proposals to amend the Barnard-Columbia relationship" or somesuch [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 13:11, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | :These "shoulds" ought to be corralled in a section on "proposals to amend the Barnard-Columbia relationship" or somesuch [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 13:11, 9 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I want to know why I never got a Barnard email address. How was a professor that didn't use courseworks supposed to know that I wasn't a Barnard student... I mean besides the fact that I didn't have boobs.[[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 15:14, 9 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 9 June 2007
There is far too much text before the table of contents. To whoever wrote it... please break it down! Reaganaut 11:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
- I've edited this about a half dozen times, and I think it finally makes some sense, though it's still a bit partisan (I plan on working on that more later). I can't think of a good way to break it down. Isn't there a wiki-command for moving the ToC to the top of the article? Absentminded 12:36, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
NPOV Dispute: This is a page that's really important to keep as factual as possible and not promote any sort of agenda of what Barnard should do. Most of it does a pretty good job of this, but the petty nitpicking is mostly first person from a writer who is just advocating his own views on what should change at Barnard. Nonsensical 13:07, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- These "shoulds" ought to be corralled in a section on "proposals to amend the Barnard-Columbia relationship" or somesuch Pacman 13:11, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
- I want to know why I never got a Barnard email address. How was a professor that didn't use courseworks supposed to know that I wasn't a Barnard student... I mean besides the fact that I didn't have boobs.wang 15:14, 9 June 2007 (EDT)
