Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alex Gartenfeld"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
: DELETE this page was vandalized, but even its original content sounded like a hoax. and, even if it werent' a hoax, i don't see how it's of interest to the CU community broadly. i don't think wcu should become myspace or a place for public displays of onanism. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 08:47, 18 January 2008 (EST) | : DELETE this page was vandalized, but even its original content sounded like a hoax. and, even if it werent' a hoax, i don't see how it's of interest to the CU community broadly. i don't think wcu should become myspace or a place for public displays of onanism. [[User:Foobar|Foobar]] 08:47, 18 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | : DELETE I've got to say, I like the vandalized version a whole lot better than the original. But ultimately I'm of the opinion that while we shouldn't necessarily decide which individuals qualify as "notable", something personal like this ought to be verified by the individual in question, and not by an antagonistic username. I don't have as much of a problem with self-promotion, as long as people are reasonable about it. | + | : DELETE I've got to say, I like the vandalized version a whole lot better than the original. But ultimately I'm of the opinion that while we shouldn't necessarily decide which individuals qualify as "notable", something personal like this ought to be verified by the individual in question, and not by an antagonistic username. I don't have as much of a problem with self-promotion, as long as people are reasonable about it. [[User:Jiabao|Jiabao]] 09:00, 18 January 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 09:00, 18 January 2008
- DELETE this page was vandalized, but even its original content sounded like a hoax. and, even if it werent' a hoax, i don't see how it's of interest to the CU community broadly. i don't think wcu should become myspace or a place for public displays of onanism. Foobar 08:47, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- DELETE I've got to say, I like the vandalized version a whole lot better than the original. But ultimately I'm of the opinion that while we shouldn't necessarily decide which individuals qualify as "notable", something personal like this ought to be verified by the individual in question, and not by an antagonistic username. I don't have as much of a problem with self-promotion, as long as people are reasonable about it. Jiabao 09:00, 18 January 2008 (EST)
