Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nacoms"
(→Unreferenced info) |
(→Unreferenced info) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hmmm...my bad, didn't mean to rollback those edits. However, where are you getting your information from? [[User:Venus in Furs|Venus in Furs]] 23:59, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | Hmmm...my bad, didn't mean to rollback those edits. However, where are you getting your information from? [[User:Venus in Furs|Venus in Furs]] 23:59, 31 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 10:14, 4 October 2008
Hmmm...my bad, didn't mean to rollback those edits. However, where are you getting your information from? Venus in Furs 23:59, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
References
Some quick googling revealed these references:
Henry Coleman: [1] Laurance J. Guido: [2] Venus in Furs 15:22, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- Thanks. This is the kind of stuff which will get the info restored. I'm sorry that I have to require this referencing. Talk to me on AIM (wikicu) if you have concerns. Admin 15:24, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- I'm actually of the opinion that the main article should not mention names unless known members include particularly prominent alumni. I certainly think it's deterimental to list the names of recent and current members since it will just lead to more edit wars. If current members don't want their identities to be revealed, then we should respect that. Most people don't really care anyway.Venus in Furs 15:51, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
- I'll second that. I don't know why there's so much about them in blue+white and bwog. Foobar 16:26, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
Discussion on above unreferenced info
I have blocked the article until we find references for the above info. Once all issues are resolved, the article will open up again. Admin 15:14, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
