Difference between revisions of "Talk:University Shield"
Absentminded (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Wait, the bastard shield is real!? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT) | Wait, the bastard shield is real!? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT) | :Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. [[User:Absentminded|Absentminded]] 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::How long until you muscle your way into the Columbia GC office and fix this shit? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 19:51, 11 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:51, 11 October 2009
Wait, the bastard shield is real!? Pacman 23:44, 4 October 2009 (EDT)
- Apparently. It's in the official style guide and everything. For the life of me I don't understand why they'd skip the original design, *and* the design they trademarked with the PTO for some Frankenstein design. Not to mention it's colored wrong despite being featured in a publication whose *title* is the definition of Columbia blue. I don't get it sometimes. Absentminded 03:06, 5 October 2009 (EDT)
- How long until you muscle your way into the Columbia GC office and fix this shit? Pacman 19:51, 11 October 2009 (EDT)
