Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spectator website takedown 2009"
(→Notable Bwog Comments Section) |
Nateoxford (talk | contribs) (→Notable Bwog Comments Section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The issue is that Bwog, if they wanted to get purgy on us, could conceivably take down Google cache. Just as long as there's a record of the old page stored somewhere. -- Anon | The issue is that Bwog, if they wanted to get purgy on us, could conceivably take down Google cache. Just as long as there's a record of the old page stored somewhere. -- Anon | ||
| + | |||
| + | * One thing you can try is to save the whole webpage as a web file or a text file onto your hard drive.[[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 14:19, 20 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 20 October 2009
Notable Bwog Comments Section
It might be cool if we could put a "Notable Bwog Comments" section in the main article. However, for the entire list of comments I think just a link will suffice. Nateoxford 04:58, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
Google cache of Bwog comments from "Columbia Daily Spectacle" [1]
Google cache of Bwog comments from "No, It's Not Another Redesign" [2]
The issue is that Bwog, if they wanted to get purgy on us, could conceivably take down Google cache. Just as long as there's a record of the old page stored somewhere. -- Anon
- One thing you can try is to save the whole webpage as a web file or a text file onto your hard drive.Nateoxford 14:19, 20 October 2009 (EDT)
