Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mike Ren"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
also this looks like a vanity page with no wikicu interest/wikiworthiness. lernerhall should spend his time on a linkedin.com page or other self-page rather than a wikicu ego page. | also this looks like a vanity page with no wikicu interest/wikiworthiness. lernerhall should spend his time on a linkedin.com page or other self-page rather than a wikicu ego page. | ||
| − | : I thought we scrapped any notability policy and decided to let vanity pages flourish? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 00:08, 2 December 2009 (EST) | + | : I thought we scrapped any notability policy and decided to let vanity pages flourish? There aren't that many of them. [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] 00:08, 2 December 2009 (EST) |
Revision as of 00:08, 2 December 2009
what is a "fu foundation scholar"? there is no reference to it on columbia's webpage: so sayeth google
also this looks like a vanity page with no wikicu interest/wikiworthiness. lernerhall should spend his time on a linkedin.com page or other self-page rather than a wikicu ego page.
- I thought we scrapped any notability policy and decided to let vanity pages flourish? There aren't that many of them. Pacman 00:08, 2 December 2009 (EST)
