Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Legends of Furnald 6"
Nateoxford (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Agreed. This is starting to get out of hand. [[User:Cam2171|cam2171]] 20:26, 6 December 2009 (EST) | Agreed. This is starting to get out of hand. [[User:Cam2171|cam2171]] 20:26, 6 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I dunno. On the one hand, it's foolish and "smells of buffoonery," as Dostoevsky would put it. On the other hand, it's harmless and does lend an air of candidness to Wikicu which differentiates it from Wikipedia. Just my two cents. [[User:Nateoxford|Nateoxford]] 06:08, 7 December 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 06:08, 7 December 2009
WikiCU editors: Delete this shit or let it go crazy? Pacman 21:40, 6 December 2009 (EST)
Agreed. This is starting to get out of hand. cam2171 20:26, 6 December 2009 (EST)
I dunno. On the one hand, it's foolish and "smells of buffoonery," as Dostoevsky would put it. On the other hand, it's harmless and does lend an air of candidness to Wikicu which differentiates it from Wikipedia. Just my two cents. Nateoxford 06:08, 7 December 2009 (EST)
