Difference between revisions of "WikiCU:Logo"
(→Comments/votes) |
(→Comments/votes) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:I think the logo looks way too bright now. Like way too much saturation tool. [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 20:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | :I think the logo looks way too bright now. Like way too much saturation tool. [[User:Stephen.wang|wang]] 20:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::I've reduced the contrast a little. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:24, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | ::I've reduced the contrast a little. [[User:Admin|Admin]] 07:24, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * I would go for the final option - reduced contrast. [[User:Alumwithtoomuchfreetime|Alumwithtoomuchfreetime]] 21:29, 21 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:29, 21 March 2007
Submissions
Submissions are considered to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 just like everything else on WikiCU.
Admin 03:58, 9 March 2007 (PST)
Admin 03:58, 9 March 2007 (PST)
Rab2148 20:36, 10 March 2007 (EST)
Ttan 19:28, 10 March 2007 (PST)
Comments/votes
- Butler by Ttan -- Puppyfury 21:28, 17 March 2007 (PDT)
- No particular prefernce. Ttan's could use a nice border I think. Keep using the pixelated wikicu as the image I see next to my bookmark though. Absentminded 18:43, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- I like the Ttan logo. I think it's very appropriate. wang 21:55, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- I also like the Ttan logo. Feinstein 01:28, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- We can't use the crown logo. Columbia is SUPER protective over the crown and the lion. They will swoop down and kill people. wang 22:28, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- Good point. Crown logo withdrawn. Admin 22:32, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ttan's logo is very harsh at the edges, so I applied some transparency. Maybe I faded the bottom edge too much. Any thoughts? I'm going to go ahead and use it as the logo for now. Admin 01:27, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- Can we make Ttan's logo a little more symmetrical? The placement of the columns is a bit awkward. Or am I issing the point? Pacman 06:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- Possibly, but then the top wouldn't line up.. I'll mess around with it tonight. Ttan 06:44, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- It looks like the admin has beaten me to it.. I'm for keeping it as it is. Ttan 12:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- I think the logo looks way too bright now. Like way too much saturation tool. wang 20:43, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- I've reduced the contrast a little. Admin 07:24, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- I would go for the final option - reduced contrast. Alumwithtoomuchfreetime 21:29, 21 March 2007 (EDT)