Difference between revisions of "Climate School"
m (link update) |
(added town halls info) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
President Bollinger created a Climate Change Task Force led by new-ish director of the Earth Institute Alex Halliday in September 2019 "to consider what more the University should be doing with respect to climate change" (email, Sept 19, 2019). "Are we marshaling our academic resources in ways that are proportionate to the magnitude and gravity of the challenges civilization will face? If we should be doing more, what would that entail and what structures within the University should be created to enhance our research, teaching, and engagement?" | President Bollinger created a Climate Change Task Force led by new-ish director of the Earth Institute Alex Halliday in September 2019 "to consider what more the University should be doing with respect to climate change" (email, Sept 19, 2019). "Are we marshaling our academic resources in ways that are proportionate to the magnitude and gravity of the challenges civilization will face? If we should be doing more, what would that entail and what structures within the University should be created to enhance our research, teaching, and engagement?" | ||
| − | + | On January 30, 2020, President Bollinger released the report, which proposed the formation of a climate school "like no other". Bollinger additionally announced that he was going to appoint a Chief Climate Officer (CCO), who will report directly to him, that Commencement 2020 (canceled due to coronavirus) would be plastic water bottle free (usually they hand out tons of them), that he would like "new ideas" on divestment be submitted to [[ASCRI]] *, and his commitment that Columbia be carbon neutral by 2050 if not sooner (this following two years of campaigning by [https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2019/01/30/columbia-carbon-neutrality/ Columbia for Carbon Neutrality]. | |
| − | + | The 104-page report described the current areas of strength in the university, the ways the task force engaged with the rest of the university for feedback, the reasons for creating a climate school, and how it might function. The task force held multiple town halls to hear from multiple parts of the University.<ref>[https://www.columbiaspectator.com/news/2019/11/12/university-wide-climate-change-task-force-seeks-to-involve-students-in-steps-toward-sustainable-future/ Spectator: Task Force Town Halls]</ref> <ref>[https://bwog.com/2019/11/climate-change-task-force-town-hall-the-climate-entity/ Bwog: Task Force Town Hall]</ref> It emphasized a systems-level, interdisciplinary approach to research, two-way engagement with the public, and "bringing knowledge to actions. The transdisciplinary research themes identified were Living with a Changing Planet, Climate Management, and Climate and an Ethical Society. The report proposed a "hub and spokes" model to resist inflexible bureaucracy that starts with recruiting existing faculty for dual-appointments with the climate school and creating joint degree/certificate programs. | |
On July 10, 2020, President Bollinger announced that the university trustees unanimously voted for the creation of the Columbia Climate School. From Halliday's July 13 blog post, "Why do we need a climate school?", it seems they will be taking the next three years to design and start the school. In an August email, Halliday wrote: "it already is clear that programs in de-carbonization, sea-level change, and food security will be major areas of expansion. At the same time, we will build upon cross-cutting expertise in climate finance, disaster resilience, environmental justice and law, communication and the arts, and climate policy and services." | On July 10, 2020, President Bollinger announced that the university trustees unanimously voted for the creation of the Columbia Climate School. From Halliday's July 13 blog post, "Why do we need a climate school?", it seems they will be taking the next three years to design and start the school. In an August email, Halliday wrote: "it already is clear that programs in de-carbonization, sea-level change, and food security will be major areas of expansion. At the same time, we will build upon cross-cutting expertise in climate finance, disaster resilience, environmental justice and law, communication and the arts, and climate policy and services." | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
[https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2020/07/13/columbia-climate-school/ Why do we need a climate school? by Alex Halliday] | [https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2020/07/13/columbia-climate-school/ Why do we need a climate school? by Alex Halliday] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 11:42, 19 September 2020
President Bollinger created a Climate Change Task Force led by new-ish director of the Earth Institute Alex Halliday in September 2019 "to consider what more the University should be doing with respect to climate change" (email, Sept 19, 2019). "Are we marshaling our academic resources in ways that are proportionate to the magnitude and gravity of the challenges civilization will face? If we should be doing more, what would that entail and what structures within the University should be created to enhance our research, teaching, and engagement?"
On January 30, 2020, President Bollinger released the report, which proposed the formation of a climate school "like no other". Bollinger additionally announced that he was going to appoint a Chief Climate Officer (CCO), who will report directly to him, that Commencement 2020 (canceled due to coronavirus) would be plastic water bottle free (usually they hand out tons of them), that he would like "new ideas" on divestment be submitted to ASCRI *, and his commitment that Columbia be carbon neutral by 2050 if not sooner (this following two years of campaigning by Columbia for Carbon Neutrality.
The 104-page report described the current areas of strength in the university, the ways the task force engaged with the rest of the university for feedback, the reasons for creating a climate school, and how it might function. The task force held multiple town halls to hear from multiple parts of the University.[1] [2] It emphasized a systems-level, interdisciplinary approach to research, two-way engagement with the public, and "bringing knowledge to actions. The transdisciplinary research themes identified were Living with a Changing Planet, Climate Management, and Climate and an Ethical Society. The report proposed a "hub and spokes" model to resist inflexible bureaucracy that starts with recruiting existing faculty for dual-appointments with the climate school and creating joint degree/certificate programs.
On July 10, 2020, President Bollinger announced that the university trustees unanimously voted for the creation of the Columbia Climate School. From Halliday's July 13 blog post, "Why do we need a climate school?", it seems they will be taking the next three years to design and start the school. In an August email, Halliday wrote: "it already is clear that programs in de-carbonization, sea-level change, and food security will be major areas of expansion. At the same time, we will build upon cross-cutting expertise in climate finance, disaster resilience, environmental justice and law, communication and the arts, and climate policy and services."
* Bollinger characterized ASCRI as an "efficient and highly effective group." Columbia Extinction Rebellion, which previously held a week-long hunger strike for divestment and other commitments from the university, worked with climate Law Professor Michael Gerrard to create a divestment proposal and submitted it to to ASCRI in December 2019. As of September 18th, 2020, the last meeting minutes posted, May 27th 2020, recorded the committee meeting virtually to hear from Halliday on the fossil fuel and industry and continue to consider the proposal.
External Links
Why do we need a climate school? by Alex Halliday
